2020
DOI: 10.1177/0961463x20905479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptualising flexibility: Challenging representations of time and society in the energy sector*

Abstract: There is broad agreement that the need to decarbonise and make better use of renewable and more intermittent sources of power will require increased flexibility in energy systems. However, organisations involved in the energy sector work with very different interpretations of what this might involve. In describing how the notion of flexibility is reified, commodified, and operationalised in sometimes disparate and sometimes connected ways, we show that matters of time and timing are routinely abstracted from t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to the above-discussed types of criticisms, Blue, Shove, and Forman (2020) call for a reconceptualization of flexibility that more strongly involves critical reflection on the temporal structuration of society, and what it would mean to change the structuration in the future. Similar calls have also been made in the energy justice literature, where aspects such as social inequality in energy supply and demand have been questioned (e.g., Ingeborgrud et al 2020;Jenkins et al 2016;Powells and Fell 2019).…”
Section: Theorizing End-user Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the above-discussed types of criticisms, Blue, Shove, and Forman (2020) call for a reconceptualization of flexibility that more strongly involves critical reflection on the temporal structuration of society, and what it would mean to change the structuration in the future. Similar calls have also been made in the energy justice literature, where aspects such as social inequality in energy supply and demand have been questioned (e.g., Ingeborgrud et al 2020;Jenkins et al 2016;Powells and Fell 2019).…”
Section: Theorizing End-user Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this, there is the assumption that all energy consumers within the city region will be able to make the required shifts in their energy practices, and become a "more responsible consumer" (GMCA, 2019), yet the different contexts of individuals may mean that engaging with DSM practices may not be possible for some. An individual's energy practices cannot be separated from the broader temporalities of their daily life and their specific context (Blue et al, 2020). As discussed by Shove and Walker (2017), energy demand is a product of the daily rhythms of life-for some, these rhythms and the contexts in which they are situated offer greater flexibility in energy practices, whilst for others they are constrained by them.…”
Section: Considering the Heterogeneity Of Actors-contextualized Actiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By understanding how occupants perform everyday practices, such as space heating, it thus become clearer how to understand and possibly transform energy related practices. This is important as energy flexibility cannot be abstracted from social practices and doing so actually risk interlocking and stabilizing current practices [31]. By investigating everyday practices, which smart home technologies target, this paper presents important knowledge on how space heating practices are performed and how they reconfigure in very different ways, depending on occupants competencies.…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%