2005
DOI: 10.1080/14623940500220202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptualising and facilitating active learning: teachers’ video‐stimulated reflective dialogues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Arguably, in the teacher education context, a post-teaching supervision discussion on practice teaching is a situation in which the use of video can be effectively combined with guidance. Powell (2005) showed that dialogues supported with VSR provided teachers with a focus for exploring their own practices and led to better articulation of their thinking process, as well as of their emotions. Further, we see that facilitating pre-service teachers' reflective processes with video and situated in the post-teaching supervision discussion has the power to integrate the teaching of knowledge and skills and the learning of reflection.…”
Section: Video As a Facilitator Of Learning To Teachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arguably, in the teacher education context, a post-teaching supervision discussion on practice teaching is a situation in which the use of video can be effectively combined with guidance. Powell (2005) showed that dialogues supported with VSR provided teachers with a focus for exploring their own practices and led to better articulation of their thinking process, as well as of their emotions. Further, we see that facilitating pre-service teachers' reflective processes with video and situated in the post-teaching supervision discussion has the power to integrate the teaching of knowledge and skills and the learning of reflection.…”
Section: Video As a Facilitator Of Learning To Teachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach has the potential to inform practice as well as research (see e.g. Clarke, 1997;Powell, 2005). There are benefits for participating teachers reflecting on their own work, but also valuable and often missed (Alexander, 2000) potential insights to be contributed by learners, and alternative, perceptive and, as Krull, Oras, and Sisask (2007) found, critical insights that can be contributed by uninvolved teachers.…”
Section: The Challengementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Video stimulated recall is an established method for helping teachers to reflect on their practice (see Moyles, Adams, & Musgrove, 2002;Pirie, 1996;Powell, 2005). Debate about refining the method focuses on the timing of the stimulated recall; Lyle (2003) argues from experience that for accurate recall it is important to conduct the video-stimulated interview as soon after the event as possible, though tiredness can work against this.…”
Section: The Challengementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was minimized through the use of unobtrusive cameras or deconstructed, for example, by locating the researcher's view on the video content in plain sight as participants enter the teaching space, implicitly inviting participants to share the researcher perspective. Most powerfully though, as Clarke (1997) and Powell (2005) observe, the knowledge generated together in video stimulated dialogue can inform practice as well research; by ensuring that we 'talk with whom we watch' (Alexander 2000, 269). In this way, concerns regarding gaze in observational and video methods can be allayed.…”
Section: Video Stimulated Dialoguementioning
confidence: 99%