Conceptualising and constructing ‘diversity’ through experiences of public and patient involvement in health research

Abstract

Background Increasing the accessibility of public and patient involvement (PPI) in health research for people from diverse backgrounds is important for ensuring all voices are heard and represented. Critiques of PPI being dominated by ‘the usual suspects’ reflect concerns over the barriers to involvement in PPI faced by people from minority groups or non-professional backgrounds. Yet, what has received less attention is how undertaking PPI work might produce diverse experiences, potentially shaping the motivation and capacity of people from different backgrounds to continue in PPI. Methods We conducted qualitative research to explore experiences of the health research PPI field in the UK and to understand how these might shape the accessibility of PPI for people of diverse backgrounds. We conducted in-depth and follow-up interviews with five PPI contributors with experience of multiple health research projects, and a focus group with nine people in professional roles relating to PPI. Interview data were analysed using a narrative approach, and then combined with the focus group data for thematic analysis. Results The structure, organisation and relationships of health research in the UK all shape PPI experiences in ways that can intersect the different backgrounds and identities of contributors, and can pose barriers to involvement and motivation for some. Navigating processes for claiming expenses can be frustrating particularly for people from lower-income backgrounds or with additional needs, and short-term research can undermine relationships of trust between contributors and professionals. Pressure on PPI coordinators to find ‘more diverse’ contributors can also undermine ongoing relationships with contributors, and how their inputs are valued. Conclusions To increase diversity within PPI, and to ensure that people of different backgrounds are supported and motivated to continue in PPI, changes are needed in the wider health research infrastructure in the UK. More resources are required to support relationships of trust over time between contributors and professionals, and to ensure the unique circumstances of each contributor are accommodated within and across PPI roles. Finally, critical reflection on the pressure in PPI to seek ‘more diverse’ contributors is needed, to understand the impacts of this on those already involved.

Broadening the diversity of consumers engaged in guidelines: a scoping review

“…For example, partnering with diverse community groups to plan and undertake engagement is recommended,11 43 as is ensuring the professionals involved view consumers as equal and possess linguistic and cultural competency 11 43. Two important factors in the diversity literature that are supported by our findings (while not being standalone themes) are the importance of trusting, long-term relationships17 42 and identifying and mitigating power imbalances 11 43…”

“…It may include having multiple consumers as members of the GDG, or involve a parallel process, for example, as participants in focus groups, interviews and workshops 9. However, consumers from diverse backgrounds may face additional barriers to participation, meaning guideline developers may need to adapt their approach and provide additional support 16 17. Despite the need for specific advice, guidance to address equity in guidelines typically includes little practical advice about how to do this 6 8.…”

Patient Engagement in a Multi-Stakeholder Workshop to Plan the Collection of Patient-Oriented Outcomes for Children with Inherited Metabolic Diseases

“…In addition, there was limited diversity among advisors who contributed to our study. The need to increase diversity among patient and public partners in health research is an established priority (Reynolds et al 2021). To address this, we have increased our reach to include a more diverse group of patient partners in our current work to implement registries.…”

Bringing lived experience into research: good practices for public involvement in research

“…Members are already trying to ensure that those who have less ability to engage with research are invited to participate. Strengthening public involvement and engagement 12 is often associated with training and development, particularly for those who are new to research and to framing feedback. Reporting the impact of PPI in research should include how people with highly embedded and relevant experience are identified and supported.…”