2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.09.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptual numerical investigation of all-steel Tube-in-Tube buckling restrained braces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“… When buckling mode shapes are utilized for initial imperfection, the amplitude of the mode shape should be less than the gap size of each side; otherwise, the model will lead to initial convergence problems. Furthermore, increasing initial imperfection increases computational cost and leads to convergence problems, which were also reported in [14,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“… When buckling mode shapes are utilized for initial imperfection, the amplitude of the mode shape should be less than the gap size of each side; otherwise, the model will lead to initial convergence problems. Furthermore, increasing initial imperfection increases computational cost and leads to convergence problems, which were also reported in [14,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Avci-Karatas et al [16] used a friction coefficient of 0.03 for the interaction between the steel core and concrete encasing where a teflon pad was utilized. Chou and Chen [13]and Heidary-Torkamani et al [15]selected friction coefficient as 0.1 for the steel core and steel encasing where grease oil was utilized. Guo et al [9] selected the friction coefficient of the steel core to steel encasing interaction as 0.1.A friction coefficient of 0.05 was utilized by Wang et al [6] for the interaction between the steel core and concrete encasing.…”
Section: Figure 1typical Buckling Restrained Bracementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the past several decades, buckling restrained devices have been developed to enhance the bearing capacity and ductility of compression members. The typical devices are the member with a large cross-sectional dimension [9], the buckling restrained brace [10][11][12], the all-steel buckling restrained braces [13][14][15][16][17], and the sleeved column [18,19]. The buckling monitoring members [20][21][22] are considered to have more potential to be applied in spatial structures in terms of deadweight and simplify the configuration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%