2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-16496-5_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptual Modeling and Integration of Static and Dynamic Aspects of Service Architectures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the dominance of UML there is a certain degree of difficulty in understanding a system represented by means of UML diagrams (Bavota et al, 2011;Otero & Dolado, 2004;Siau & Cao, 2001;Siau, Erickson, & Lee, 2005). Previous research has indicated several reasons: among which (1) the level of structural complexity of UML exceeding the limits of human working memory (cognitive load) in terms of the ability for effective information processing (Cruz-Lemus, Genero, & Piattini, 2008;Cruz-Lemus, Maes, Genero, Poels, & Piattini, 2010;Erickson & Siau, 2007;Wilmont, Hengeveld, Barendsen, & Hoppenbrouwers, 2013); and (2) lack of comprehension methodologies (Erickson & Siau, 2007) and, in particular, its impreciseness about the combination of interactive, structural and behavioral aspects together in a single model (Gustas, 2010). Furthermore, (3) it is not easy to find relevant subsets suitable for a modeling goal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the dominance of UML there is a certain degree of difficulty in understanding a system represented by means of UML diagrams (Bavota et al, 2011;Otero & Dolado, 2004;Siau & Cao, 2001;Siau, Erickson, & Lee, 2005). Previous research has indicated several reasons: among which (1) the level of structural complexity of UML exceeding the limits of human working memory (cognitive load) in terms of the ability for effective information processing (Cruz-Lemus, Genero, & Piattini, 2008;Cruz-Lemus, Maes, Genero, Poels, & Piattini, 2010;Erickson & Siau, 2007;Wilmont, Hengeveld, Barendsen, & Hoppenbrouwers, 2013); and (2) lack of comprehension methodologies (Erickson & Siau, 2007) and, in particular, its impreciseness about the combination of interactive, structural and behavioral aspects together in a single model (Gustas, 2010). Furthermore, (3) it is not easy to find relevant subsets suitable for a modeling goal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous paper [2] we already discussed a set of issues related to the widely accepted standard UML [20,23,24,25,26]. In its current form UML performs poor in supporting an educational perspective.…”
Section: Modeling Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Erickson, Siau, 2007) present the complexity metric of the UML which scores from 2 to 11 times more complex than those of other methods due to the diversity of supported constructs and diagrams. Among the other fundamental deficiencies of UML is that it is unclear how to combine interactive, structural and behavioural aspects together in a single model (Gustas, 2010). Furthermore, (Buckl et al, 2010) points out the "noisiness" of modelling languages with various concepts, that can result in misusing concepts and creation of unintended models, i.e.…”
Section: Problem Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%