Conceptual Links between Landscape Diversity and Diet Diversity: A Roadmap for Transdisciplinary Research

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>Malnutrition linked to poor quality diets affects at least 2 billion people. Forests, as well as agricultural systems linked to trees, are key sources of dietary diversity in rural settings. In the present article, we develop conceptual links between diet diversity and forested landscape mosaics within the rural tropics. First, we summarize the state of knowledge regarding diets obtained from forests, trees, and agroforests. We then hypothesize how disturbed secondary forests, edge habitats, forest access, and landscape diversity can function in bolstering dietary diversity. Taken together, these ideas help us build a framework illuminating four pathways (direct, agroecological, energy, and market pathways) connecting forested landscapes to diet diversity. Finally, we offer recommendations to fill remaining knowledge gaps related to diet and forest cover monitoring. We argue that better evaluation of the role of land cover complexity will help avoid overly simplistic views of food security and, instead, uncover nutritional synergies with forest conservation and restoration.</jats:p>

Climate, landscape diversity, and food sovereignty in arid Australia: The firestick farming hypothesis

“…Despite a growing recognition that both species diversity and landscape diversity should have substantial impacts on measures of human well‐being, especially in dietary quality (both diversity and amount consumed) (Gergel et al, 2020) there has been very little evidence that either improves measures of food consumption outside of an agricultural context (Powell et al, 2015). Our results show that landscape heterogeneity, in the form of fire regime diversity, substantially impacts dietary quality.…”

Re-integrating ecology into integrated landscape approaches

“…Although the majority of ILAs have explicit conservation objectives (Hart et al 2015;Carmenta et al 2020), the integration of ecology in ILAs is limited by a lack of understanding about the impact of human stressors on biodiversity, and the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem services (ES) and their benefits to health and well-being in general (Cordingley et al 2016;Gergel et al 2020). Better integration of ecology requires the integration of two approaches: one focusing on conventional scientific studies of biodiversity and biophysical parameters; and the other focusing on the participation of relevant stakeholders, using various participatory methods to co-create options that meet multiple stakeholder needs.…”

Editorial: Impacts of Tropical Landscape Change on Human Diet and Local Food Systems

“…This special issue looks at the reverse side of this relationship -how land use change affects the diets of local communities living in landscapes where change is taking place. Clear links between forest cover and diet and nutritional outcomes have been shown (Johnson et al, 2013;Ickowitz et al, 2014;Rasolofoson et al, 2018;Fisher et al, 2019), while more recent work has started to disentangle the differential impacts of land use type, composition and configuration on diets and the consumption of specific food groups (Rasmussen et al, 2019;Gergel et al, 2020). This special issue brings together a collection of papers that examine the effects of land use and land use change on diet and nutritional outcomes in the tropics.…”