2013
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2012.0073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptual Framework for Development of Comprehensive e-Health Evaluation Tool

Abstract: The framework helps understand various aspects of e-health programs and their impact that require evaluation at different stages of the life cycle. The study led to the development of a new and comprehensive e-health evaluation tool, named the Khoja-Durrani-Scott Framework for e-Health Evaluation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
92
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
92
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Khoja et al [26] also conducted interviews. Both of these are framed along the lifecycle phases of a telehealth service.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Khoja et al [26] also conducted interviews. Both of these are framed along the lifecycle phases of a telehealth service.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 These dimensions were also categorized as follows: (a) global-this level deals with the global policies of complementarity, such as standardization and interjurisdictional care; (b) national and provincial/ subnational competence-to facilitate healthcare within a jurisdiction; and (c) individual institutions-this level deals with the policies necessary to facilitate e-health at the local level, meaning institutional or individual practice. 21 Considering the level of complexity of telehealth processes, successive approximations are important, gaining momentum as efforts converge.…”
Section: Telehealth Distance Education Course In Latin Americamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes, on the methodological side, the reporting of qualitative studies [70], and on applications side, the reporting of evaluation studies on health social media and m-health [71], and of a postulated framework for telemedicine evaluation [72]. Such specialized reporting guidelines are useful since they give additional guidance for specific kind of studies, yet without cross-linkage they have a potential to lead to fragmentation of the potential methods and evidence-bases.…”
Section: Other Reporting Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%