The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1979
DOI: 10.2172/6058274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptual design of the Fast-Liner Reactor (FLR) for fusion power

Abstract: The generation of fusion power from the Fast-Liner Reactor (FLR) concept envisages the implosion of a thin (3mm) metallic cylinder (0.2-m radius by 0.2-m length) onto a preinjected plasma. This plasma would be heated to thermonuclear temperatures by adiabatic compression, pressure confinement would be provided by the liner inertia, and thermal insulation of the wall-confined plasma would be established by an embedded azimuthal magnetic field. A 2-to 3-ys burn would follow the ^10 4 m/s radial implosion and wou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the near term, if we focus on liner compression of plasma to fusion conditions, without regard to substantial nuclear gain, we may succeed on a scientific problem that has challenged the megagauss community for over half a century. Extrapolation of such solid-density liners to reactor levels, however, requires both development of a program that can handle the intermediate, but very high energies of the subsequent explosion of material, and that can economically replace the solid liner in a high current circuit for repetitive operation [30]. The former problem may yield to an appropriate laboratory arrangement for handling blast and fragmentation, a difficult, but not fundamentally impossible notion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the near term, if we focus on liner compression of plasma to fusion conditions, without regard to substantial nuclear gain, we may succeed on a scientific problem that has challenged the megagauss community for over half a century. Extrapolation of such solid-density liners to reactor levels, however, requires both development of a program that can handle the intermediate, but very high energies of the subsequent explosion of material, and that can economically replace the solid liner in a high current circuit for repetitive operation [30]. The former problem may yield to an appropriate laboratory arrangement for handling blast and fragmentation, a difficult, but not fundamentally impossible notion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This inspired the Linus project at the Naval Research Laboratory [25], and later the fast-liner project at Los Alamos [26]. In Russia, MIF took a form called magnitnoye obzhatiye, or magnetic compression (MAGO), first revealed by Russian scientists when the Cold War ended [27][28][29], and worked on collaboratively with experiments at LANL [30].…”
Section: Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The one-dimensional magnetohydrostatic (MHS) 1 code, developed to model the Fast-Liner Reactor [23], was modified for application to the DZPR study.…”
Section: Comparison Between Zero-dimensional and One-dimensional Burnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plasma parameters are computed as functions of time by a two-step method [23]. First, the Lagrangian mesh is fixed in space, and all diffusion and loss processes are evaluated for a given time step.…”
Section: (A) Actually Computed From Realistic Circuit/plasma Model (Smentioning
confidence: 99%