Abstract:The generation of fusion power from the Fast-Liner Reactor (FLR) concept envisages the implosion of a thin (3mm) metallic cylinder (0.2-m radius by 0.2-m length) onto a preinjected plasma. This plasma would be heated to thermonuclear temperatures by adiabatic compression, pressure confinement would be provided by the liner inertia, and thermal insulation of the wall-confined plasma would be established by an embedded azimuthal magnetic field. A 2-to 3-ys burn would follow the ^10 4 m/s radial implosion and wou… Show more
“…In the near term, if we focus on liner compression of plasma to fusion conditions, without regard to substantial nuclear gain, we may succeed on a scientific problem that has challenged the megagauss community for over half a century. Extrapolation of such solid-density liners to reactor levels, however, requires both development of a program that can handle the intermediate, but very high energies of the subsequent explosion of material, and that can economically replace the solid liner in a high current circuit for repetitive operation [30]. The former problem may yield to an appropriate laboratory arrangement for handling blast and fragmentation, a difficult, but not fundamentally impossible notion.…”
Several plasma targets have been proposed for compression by imploding liners, ranging from magnetically-confined to wall-supported concepts. In all cases, a critical issue remains one of preventing the high atomic-number material of the liner from penetrating the plasma and countering the gain in plasma temperature sought by compression. Two factors foster development of such deleterious penetration: the creation of a liquid/vapor layer at the liner surface at high magnetic fields, and disruption of this layer by Rayleigh-Taylor instability in the final stages of plasma compression. Within a general consideration of issues of liner compression of plasma, we discuss reactor cost optimization by use of plasma at pressures intermediate between the values of conventional magnetically-or inertially-confined fusion concepts. We also describe the development of an equilibrium layer of vapor adjacent to the liner surface at high magnetic fields, the instability of such a thin layer, and the consequences of liner deceleration and rebound for reactor concepts and research progress.
“…In the near term, if we focus on liner compression of plasma to fusion conditions, without regard to substantial nuclear gain, we may succeed on a scientific problem that has challenged the megagauss community for over half a century. Extrapolation of such solid-density liners to reactor levels, however, requires both development of a program that can handle the intermediate, but very high energies of the subsequent explosion of material, and that can economically replace the solid liner in a high current circuit for repetitive operation [30]. The former problem may yield to an appropriate laboratory arrangement for handling blast and fragmentation, a difficult, but not fundamentally impossible notion.…”
Several plasma targets have been proposed for compression by imploding liners, ranging from magnetically-confined to wall-supported concepts. In all cases, a critical issue remains one of preventing the high atomic-number material of the liner from penetrating the plasma and countering the gain in plasma temperature sought by compression. Two factors foster development of such deleterious penetration: the creation of a liquid/vapor layer at the liner surface at high magnetic fields, and disruption of this layer by Rayleigh-Taylor instability in the final stages of plasma compression. Within a general consideration of issues of liner compression of plasma, we discuss reactor cost optimization by use of plasma at pressures intermediate between the values of conventional magnetically-or inertially-confined fusion concepts. We also describe the development of an equilibrium layer of vapor adjacent to the liner surface at high magnetic fields, the instability of such a thin layer, and the consequences of liner deceleration and rebound for reactor concepts and research progress.
“…This inspired the Linus project at the Naval Research Laboratory [25], and later the fast-liner project at Los Alamos [26]. In Russia, MIF took a form called magnitnoye obzhatiye, or magnetic compression (MAGO), first revealed by Russian scientists when the Cold War ended [27][28][29], and worked on collaboratively with experiments at LANL [30].…”
In this community white paper, we describe an approach to achieving fusion which employs a hybrid of elements from the traditional magnetic and inertial fusion concepts, called magneto-inertial fusion (MIF). The status of MIF research in North America at multiple institutions is summarized including recent progress, research opportunities, and future plans.Keywords Magneto-inertial fusion Á Magnetized target fusion Á Liner Á Plasma jets Á Fusion energy Á MagLIF
DescriptionMagneto-inertial fusion (MIF) (aka magnetized target fusion) [1][2][3] is an approach to fusion that combines the compressional heating of inertial confinement fusion (ICF) with the magnetically reduced thermal transport and magnetically enhanced alpha heating of magnetic confinement fusion (MCF). From an MCF perspective, the higher density, shorter confinement times, and compressional heating as the dominant heating mechanism reduce the impact of instabilities. From an ICF perspective, the primary benefits are potentially orders of magnitude reduction in the difficult to achieve qr parameter (areal density), and potentially significant reduction in velocity requirements and hydrodynamic instabilities for compression drivers. In fact, ignition becomes theoretically possible from qr B 0.01 g/cm 2 up to conventional ICF values of qr * 1.0 g/cm 2 , and as in MCF, Br rather than qr becomes the key figure-of-merit for ignition because of the enhanced alpha deposition [4]. Within the lower-qr parameter space, MIF exploits lower required implosion velocities (2-100 km/s, compared to the ICF minimum of 350-400 km/s) allowing the use of much more efficient (g C 0.3) pulsed power drivers, while at the highest (i.e., ICF) end of the qr range, both higher gain G at a given implosion velocity as well as lower implosion velocity and reduced hydrodynamic instabilities are theoretically possible. To avoid confusion, it must be emphasized that the wellknown conventional ICF burn fraction formula does not apply for the lower-qr ''liner-driven'' MIF schemes, since it is the much larger mass and qr of the liner (and not that of the burning fuel) that determines the ''dwell time'' and fuel burnup fraction. In all cases, MIF approaches seek to satisfy/ exceed the inertial fusion energy (IFE) figure-of-merit gG * 7-10 required in an economical plant with reasonable recirculating power fraction. A great advantage of MIF is indeed its extremely wide parameter space which allows it greater versatility in overcoming difficulties in implementation or technology, as evidenced by the four diverse approaches and associated implosion velocities shown in Fig. 1.MIF approaches occupy an attractive region in thermonuclear q-T parameter space, as shown in a paper by
“…The one-dimensional magnetohydrostatic (MHS) 1 code, developed to model the Fast-Liner Reactor [23], was modified for application to the DZPR study.…”
Section: Comparison Between Zero-dimensional and One-dimensional Burnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plasma parameters are computed as functions of time by a two-step method [23]. First, the Lagrangian mesh is fixed in space, and all diffusion and loss processes are evaluated for a given time step.…”
Section: (A) Actually Computed From Realistic Circuit/plasma Model (Smentioning
A conceptual DT fusion reactor is described that is based upon the dense Z-pinch (DZP). This study emphasizes plasma modelling and the parametric assessment of the reactor energy balance. Numerical models have been developed and evaluated to achieve this goal. The resulting optimal reactor operating point promises a high-Q, low-yield system of a scale that may allow the use of conventional highvoltage Marx/water-line technology to drive a potentially very small reactor system.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.