2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptual design of the COMPASS upgrade tokamak

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is limited by the surface water boiling which was, by the way, just recently overcome 12 . Testing survival under those extreme conditions (mostly using liquid metal heat shield 13 ) will be one of two major goals of tokamak COMPASS-Upgrade 14 , 15 , capable of reaching 100 MW/m 16 . This is, for better imagination, comparable to the Sun surface 63 MW/m radiation.…”
Section: Thermonuclear Fusion Reduction Due To Elm-induced Tungsten D...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is limited by the surface water boiling which was, by the way, just recently overcome 12 . Testing survival under those extreme conditions (mostly using liquid metal heat shield 13 ) will be one of two major goals of tokamak COMPASS-Upgrade 14 , 15 , capable of reaching 100 MW/m 16 . This is, for better imagination, comparable to the Sun surface 63 MW/m radiation.…”
Section: Thermonuclear Fusion Reduction Due To Elm-induced Tungsten D...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This simplified description is complicated in practice by plasma and/or impurity transport, plasma instabilities (ELMs, 9 ,p. 409] , sawtooth instabilities 9 ,p. 365] ), and plasma flows in the divertor region that these divertor legs occupy. Therefore, to support the DEMO divertor design, existing facilities are being upgraded 10 , and a new tokamak facility to study the plasma exhaust is under construction 11 , 12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 29) with the proportionality constant given by the fitting procedure can be used to predict the SOL width for future tokamaks, such as ITER, COMPASS Upgrade, JT-60SA, and DTT. Considering the baseline scenario just before the L-H transition, one obtains λ q,th 3.5 mm for ITER (R 0 = 6.2 m, a = 2 m, q = 2, P SOL = 18 MW, κ = 1.4, ne = 4 • 10 19 m −3 , and B T = 5.3 T [78]), λ q,th 1.8 mm for COMPASS Upgrade (R 0 = 0.89 m, a = 0.27 m, q = 2.6, P SOL = 3.7 MW, κ = 1.8, ne = 2 • 10 20 m −3 , and B T = 5.0 T [79]), λ q,th 7.1 mm for JT-60SA (R 0 = 2.9 m, a = 1.2 m, q = 3, P SOL = 10 MW, κ = 1.9, ne = 6.3 • 10 19 m −3 , and B T = 2.3 T [80]), and λ q,th 3.0 mm for DTT (R 0 = 2.1 m, a = 0.6 m, q = 3, P SOL = 15 MW, κ = 1.7, ne = 1.8 • 10 20 m −3 , and B T = 6.0 T [81]). The theoretical value of λ q for ITER Lmode is within the range of values predicted by the experimental scaling laws derived in Ref.…”
Section: Near Solmentioning
confidence: 99%