1981
DOI: 10.1016/0141-0296(81)90016-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptual design of floating drilling production and storage caisson for arctic waters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear, however, that horizontal resistance is significantly lower for a downward breaking cone. Gerwick and Jahns (1979) observed, from comparative tests, that the force on an upward breaking cone is 1.5-3 times greater than that for a downward breaking cone.…”
Section: Discussion Of Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is clear, however, that horizontal resistance is significantly lower for a downward breaking cone. Gerwick and Jahns (1979) observed, from comparative tests, that the force on an upward breaking cone is 1.5-3 times greater than that for a downward breaking cone.…”
Section: Discussion Of Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ice-breaker supported drillships have also operated for almost five months of the year in deep-water areas of the same region. Production from these and other regions with even more severe ice conditions will, however, require new technology, and considerable effort is therefore being devoted to the development and evaluation of new concepts for offshore structures that will operate safely and economically under severe conditions (Jazrawi andKhanna 1978, Gerwick andJahns 1979). One such concept is a downward cone, which could be fitted to a cylindrical structure and operated in either a fixed or an oscillating mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent publication by Gerwick and Jahns [8] describes the conceptual design of a deep-water floating caisson vessel with a conicalshaped ice breaking surface. Their work included model tests from which they concluded that the downward-breaking mode effectively reduced the caisson's response by a factor between 1.5 and 3, compared to the upward-breaking mode.…”
Section: Oownward-breaking Conementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally recognized that the use of a conical structure at the waterline leads to reduced loads compared to a vertical sided structure such as a cylinder [3,4]. The reduction in loads is primarily due to different ice breaking modes -a conical structure induces flexural failure of the ice whereas vertical sided structures typically induce crushing failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%