2021
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2021.615222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptual Design of a Modular Floating Multi-Purpose Island

Abstract: The design of a modular floating multi-purpose island inherently involves interaction within a group with a large range of backgrounds such as engineering, architecture, sociology, climate modeling, and more. A heuristic design approach was adopted for future island developers to make a first conceptual design. Four major design considerations were distinguished to discretize the design space: module size, module shape, module principle, and module connection and mooring. For each consideration a set of evalua… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, rather than abandoning islands, can islands and their infrastructure be designed to be raised with SLR, potentially avoiding the need for migration? Similarly, floating islands (Proetzel 1983, Souravlias et al 2020, Drummen and Olbert 2021, Flikkema et al 2021, Tamis et al 2021 might be explored with similar benefits.…”
Section: Physical and Engineering Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, rather than abandoning islands, can islands and their infrastructure be designed to be raised with SLR, potentially avoiding the need for migration? Similarly, floating islands (Proetzel 1983, Souravlias et al 2020, Drummen and Olbert 2021, Flikkema et al 2021, Tamis et al 2021 might be explored with similar benefits.…”
Section: Physical and Engineering Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We see that the motion limitations for the energy hub and aquafarming modules are less strict. For further details of the floating concept, see Drummen and Olbert (2021).…”
Section: Platform Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These tests comprised three body shapes and different coupled configurations. It was concluded that the cuboid module shape scored best, and its dimension was defined based on the inherent advantages regarding modularity, building ease and transport and installation effort [11]. Table 1 lists properties of such a floating module at its basic design stage.…”
Section: Test Case Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional benefits are lower transportation, fabrication, and installation costs and the potential expansion of practical VLFS systems [10]. Nevertheless, size, shape, and joint design to connect the basic modular units should be carefully investigated to meet a mix of specific requirements [11]. Riggs and Ertekin [12] used two-dimensional and three-dimensional approximate hydroelasticity theories to predict the dynamic responses of a MFS consisting of different number of modules in regular waves, where a linearized stiffness matrix represented the connecting system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%