2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11145-016-9628-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptual coherence, comprehension, and vocabulary acquisition: A knowledge effect?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier studies conducted by Corvette and his colleagues showed outperformance in comprehension, writing and vocabulary of science among students who, in addition to taking part in hands-on activities, have read scientific texts [46,47]. Another investigation led by Cervetti demonstrated a better information recall from reviewed text of students who read conceptually coherent science paragraphs compared to peers who read unassociated materials [48]. By reading texts related to STEM fields, students have the chance to acquire STEM fields-related vocabulary and use them as a tool to reflect their own understanding, which support the development of technical and theoretical ideas in learners [49].…”
Section: Stem Learning Materials and Performance In Scientific Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier studies conducted by Corvette and his colleagues showed outperformance in comprehension, writing and vocabulary of science among students who, in addition to taking part in hands-on activities, have read scientific texts [46,47]. Another investigation led by Cervetti demonstrated a better information recall from reviewed text of students who read conceptually coherent science paragraphs compared to peers who read unassociated materials [48]. By reading texts related to STEM fields, students have the chance to acquire STEM fields-related vocabulary and use them as a tool to reflect their own understanding, which support the development of technical and theoretical ideas in learners [49].…”
Section: Stem Learning Materials and Performance In Scientific Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 refers to personalizing content and activities in ways that tap into children's prior domain knowledge and support word knowledge and text comprehension (Cervetti, Wright, & Hwang, 2016;Goldstone & Son, 2005). The noncognitive factor refers to personalizing content and activities in ways that spark interest in learning from text (Walkington & Bernacki, 2018).…”
Section: Using a Smart Design To Develop Two Approaches To Context Pementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, CCTs are designed to help children leverage domain knowledge in science and social studies and to connect new learning from text to a preexisting schema, or knowledge structure (Ausubel, 1968;Bransford & Schwartz, 1999;Kintsch, 2009;Perfetti & Stafura, 2014). Although CCTs are not "leveled" or matched to a child's independent reading level, there is growing experimental evidence that children show greater gains in background knowledge and text comprehension during reading activities with CCTs than with leveled texts (LT) (L. T. Brown, Mohr, Wilcox, & Barrett, 2018;Cervetti et al, 2016). CCTs play a critical role in content area literacy instruction in which teachers integrate informational texts into science and social studies lessons.…”
Section: Using a Smart Design To Develop Two Approaches To Context Pementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The central importance of networked conceptual knowledge in individuals’ minds for new concept acquisition has been supported in vocabulary and concept instructional and developmental studies. For instance, teaching vocabulary in clusters of related concepts and in the context of learning concepts has been shown to facilitate the learning of new, but related, concepts, including science (e.g., Cervetti et al., ; Neuman & Dwyer, ; Neuman et al., ; Neuman & Wright, ). That is, semantic relatedness of concepts is a potential asset for learning new concepts (Nagy & Hiebert, ).…”
Section: Evidence Of the Importance Of Networked Conceptual Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%