2007
DOI: 10.1075/cilt.281.03lee
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptual Blending and the Windowing of Attention in Simultaneous Constructions in Irish Sign Language

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, there was a gradual increase in the dual use of hands across the three cohorts, suggesting that NSL may be converging on this particular device for indicating temporal overlap between two events. The use of simultaneous constructions to convey temporal information has been observed in a number of other sign languages, including ASL, British Sign Language, Danish Sign Language, Irish Sign Language, and Quebec Sign Language (Emmorey, 2002; Engberg-Pedersen, 1993, 1994; Leeson & Saeed, 2002; Liddell, 2003; Miller, 1994; Morgan, 2002; Rathmann, 2005). Simultaneous constructions may prove to be a sign language universal, taking advantage of the capacity for simultaneity in the manual modality, in contrast to the strict linearization required by vocal production (e.g., Emmorey, 1995; Padden, 1988; Perniss, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, there was a gradual increase in the dual use of hands across the three cohorts, suggesting that NSL may be converging on this particular device for indicating temporal overlap between two events. The use of simultaneous constructions to convey temporal information has been observed in a number of other sign languages, including ASL, British Sign Language, Danish Sign Language, Irish Sign Language, and Quebec Sign Language (Emmorey, 2002; Engberg-Pedersen, 1993, 1994; Leeson & Saeed, 2002; Liddell, 2003; Miller, 1994; Morgan, 2002; Rathmann, 2005). Simultaneous constructions may prove to be a sign language universal, taking advantage of the capacity for simultaneity in the manual modality, in contrast to the strict linearization required by vocal production (e.g., Emmorey, 1995; Padden, 1988; Perniss, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temporal relationship between the two hands as they move, simultaneously or sequentially, encodes the temporal relation between the events. The use of simultaneous constructions has been observed in multiple sign languages, including ASL, Danish Sign Language, German Sign Language, Irish Sign Language, and Quebec Sign Language (Engberg-Pedersen, 1993, 1994; Leeson & Saeed, 2002; Liddell, 2003; Miller, 1994; Perniss, 2007). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, event narratives exhibit a high degree of non-prototypical alignments, representing elements from both perspectives. I argue that the use of non-prototypically aligned forms can be motivated by discourse constraints of efficiency and informativeness, in conjunction with a pragmatically-determined preference to focus on the interaction between characters (Leeson and Saeed, 2002) and to represent events from an egocentric point of view (Engberg-Pedersen, 1993).…”
Section: Previous Research On the Simultaneous Use Of Different Perspmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the availability of multiple independent articulators makes possible the simultaneous representation of independent meaningful elements. These simultaneous constructions are defined as representations that are produced in more than one articulatory channel, whereby each channel bears distinct and independent meaning units, which stand in some relationship to each other (Miller 1994, Engberg-Pedersen 1994, Leeson and Saeed 2002, Vermeerbergen 2001.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation