1989
DOI: 10.5951/jresematheduc.20.1.0008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptual Bases of Arithmetic Errors: The Case of Decimal Fractions

Abstract: This study examines children's efforts to make sense of new mathematics instruction. The study documents major categories of errors that appear consistently as children learn decimal fractions. It then establishes the conceptual sources of these errors. Whole number errors derive from children's applying rules for interpreting multidigit integers. Fraction errors derive from children's efforts to interpret decimals as fractions. Different curriculum sequences influence the probability that these classes of err… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
23
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, one item asked, “Which of the following numbers is greater than 0.23 but less than 0.57?” then posed 0.046 as one of the answer choices. Previous research (Resnick et al, 1989) has established that students know from their study of whole numbers that including a zero to the left of a number does not change the value; overgeneralization of this rule to decimal numbers thus causes errors. This was in fact the case on our assessment as well, where 71% of fourth graders and 61% of fifth graders chose this incorrect option.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, one item asked, “Which of the following numbers is greater than 0.23 but less than 0.57?” then posed 0.046 as one of the answer choices. Previous research (Resnick et al, 1989) has established that students know from their study of whole numbers that including a zero to the left of a number does not change the value; overgeneralization of this rule to decimal numbers thus causes errors. This was in fact the case on our assessment as well, where 71% of fourth graders and 61% of fifth graders chose this incorrect option.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several inherent sources of difficulty interfere with understanding it. The largest is the meaning of the decimal point, which many students fail to understand (Resnick et al, 1989). Whole numbers also do not ordinarily include 0s to the left of the first nonzero digit, but decimals often do (we write .0029 but not ordinarily 0029).…”
Section: Inherent Sources Of Difficultymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have also worked to understand the misconceptions students hold with decimals, especially related to foundational understanding. One error identified with fractions also noted with decimals is whole number bias (i.e., interpreting decimals with whole number knowledge; Resnick et al, 1989). This is also referred to as natural number bias (McMullen et al, 2015).…”
Section: Rational Number Error Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%