2015
DOI: 10.1177/0042098015577915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptual approaches to service provision in cities throughout history

Abstract: All cities, from the distant past to the present, provide services for their residents, but the nature and level of urban services vary widely, as do the providers. How are we to understand this variation? We examine the major theoretical and conceptual approaches to urban services, and find that none is sufficiently comprehensive to explain patterns of service provision in all types of cities: public choice theory, co-production, critical theory, urban political ecology, collective action theory, and social i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, published maps are essential for our analysis, but sometimes this spatial information is augmented by textual descriptions of service facilities that need to be interpreted in conjunction with map information. For the three historical cases explored here, the most valuable information was derived from anthropologists (Prins ; Levy ), architectural historians (Gutschow , 2011; Ghaidan ), and urban historians with an explicitly spatial orientation (Laughton ; MMCP 2013); for specifics on spatial data used, see Stanley and colleagues (). In cases where we were unable to locate published maps of historical cities showing neighborhoods or service facilities within them, we painstakingly reconciled current maps with textual references about the historical trajectories of individual neighborhoods and urban institutions.…”
Section: Mapping Urban Services and Social Inequality: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Likewise, published maps are essential for our analysis, but sometimes this spatial information is augmented by textual descriptions of service facilities that need to be interpreted in conjunction with map information. For the three historical cases explored here, the most valuable information was derived from anthropologists (Prins ; Levy ), architectural historians (Gutschow , 2011; Ghaidan ), and urban historians with an explicitly spatial orientation (Laughton ; MMCP 2013); for specifics on spatial data used, see Stanley and colleagues (). In cases where we were unable to locate published maps of historical cities showing neighborhoods or service facilities within them, we painstakingly reconciled current maps with textual references about the historical trajectories of individual neighborhoods and urban institutions.…”
Section: Mapping Urban Services and Social Inequality: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, our project seeks to build a stronger framework for understanding service inequality by examining theoretical models of service provision (Smith et al. ). In cities today, most urban services are provided by governments at various levels—municipal, state, or federal.…”
Section: Conclusion: Moving Forward With the Archaeology Of The Humanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organic and inorganic waste has influenced coastal settlement patterns and urban design since antiquity because locations of waste disposal and management relate to factors as diverse as wind direction and social class (Smith et al. ; Kukkonen et al. ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I was stimulated to write this paper by a seeming contradiction: I am concerned with theory and have published several papers on the subject (Smith 1992(Smith , 2011Smith et al 2016); my approach to theory and epistemology are not, however, included in definitions of 'archaeological theory' by prominent archaeologists. Figure 1 lists the diverse approaches considered 'archaeological theory' by Ian Hodder (2012) and Julian Thomas (2015).…”
Section: Debatementioning
confidence: 99%