Conceptual and practical issues in qualitative research: Reflections on a life-history study

Abstract

Although qualitative research is becoming increasingly popular as a means of understanding not only occupation but also a range of other human health related phenomena, the complex conceptual underpinnings of the paradigm remain relatively unexplored in the literature. This article addresses such a perceived gap. Context specificity, emic perspectives, its iterative nature and power relations are four distinct conceptual dimensions of qualitative research which are discussed. The article also includes reflections on conceptual dimensions and practical issues in relation to a qualitative study which adopted a life history approach. These reflections highlight how the conceptual dimensions underpinning qualitative research guide the process in life history research and shape the experience of life history researchers. The practical considerations which focus on participant qualities, effects on the researcher and the participant-researcher relationship are particularly relevant for potential life history researchers. The article concludes with a discussion on the value of life history as a qualitative research approach for occupational therapy and occupational science.

Dietitians' practice in giving carbohydrate advice in the management of type 2 diabetes: a mixed methods study

“…Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and underwent thematic analysis . Texts were read and re‐read, and then coded for meaning using an inductive, iterative process . Codes were then grouped into meaning units and themes generated.…”

A Systematic Review of Research Strategies Used in Qualitative Studies on School Bullying and Victimization

“…More specifically, the context-specific nature of qualitative research identifies the complex relations between what participants do and how and where they live. In bullying research, developing a deeper understanding of how complex contextual forces (e.g., home, neighborhood, and school) interact to influence how and why bullying occurs can enhance our understanding of what triggers bullying (Wicks & Whiteford, 2006). This more robust, context-specific description of a particular reality construction is more likely to produce data that reflects victims’ perceptions (Ungar & Nichol, 2002).…”

Children's Voices: Conflict‐Affected Orphans in Residential Care in Jammu and Kashmir

“…The questions were so phrased that no pre‐conceived ideas, interests or theoretical understanding was imposed on the participants (Giske and Artinian, ). This allowed for flexibility, with an iterative style of eliciting and categorising responses to questions, describing variations, explaining relationships and individual experiences (Wicks and Whiteford, ). The children were free to respond in their own words (Yuksel, ).…”