2013
DOI: 10.5846/stxb201206130852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concepts, processes and quantification methods of the forest water conservation at the multiple scales

Abstract: Wang X X, Shen H T, Li X Y, Jing F. Concepts, processes and quantification methods of the forest water conservation at the multiple scales. Acta

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During this period, the forests fully play the function of accumulating precipitation, making AFWC significantly larger than other months. From October to May, the study area had scarce precipitation and a dry climate, which caused the water stored in the forests to be consumed for evapotranspiration and supplementary runoff [17,77], and the AFWC showed a negative value. When the wetness index of the ZJG, ZTM and FP basins was greater than 0.64, 0.60 and 0.83, respectively, the AFWC in the basins was all positive.…”
Section: Monthly Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…During this period, the forests fully play the function of accumulating precipitation, making AFWC significantly larger than other months. From October to May, the study area had scarce precipitation and a dry climate, which caused the water stored in the forests to be consumed for evapotranspiration and supplementary runoff [17,77], and the AFWC showed a negative value. When the wetness index of the ZJG, ZTM and FP basins was greater than 0.64, 0.60 and 0.83, respectively, the AFWC in the basins was all positive.…”
Section: Monthly Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many studies have assessed the increase in water retention amounts resulting from ER project (Wu et al, 2016; Xue et al, 2022), ER project in some water‐deficient areas may even lead to a decrease in water retention capacity (Cui et al, 2022), which hinders the development of ER measures and brings many uncertainties to water retention. Therefore, the impact of ER project on water retention is highly complex, particularly in regions with unique topography and water resources (Van Dijke et al, 2022; Wang et al, 2013). It is necessary to systematically reveal the variation trend and influencing factors of water retention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water conservation refers to the process of retaining floodwaters and regulating runoff within the canopy, litter, and soil functional layers of forests [12][13][14]; it has two time-scale features (rainwater events: rainfall interception in the rainy season; and seasonal: regulation of runoff in the dry season) and involves multiple functional layers, including canopy interception, litter-layer water retention, soil-layer water storage, ecosystem evapotranspiration, and runoff production, which increase the difficulty involved in quantifying the water conservation function. Different quantitative methods and models, including the water balance method [15,16], soil water storage method [17], and canopy interception residual method [18], have been developed to quantify the water conservation function of forests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21] evaluated the water conservation function of typical planted forests and natural secondary forests on the Loess Plateau using the comprehensive water storage capacity method. However, the above methods might lead to unreasonable results for forest water conservation, due to their one-sided nature [14]. Moreover, the estimation results of different methods vary greatly and are not comparable [19,21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%