1981
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-5931-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concepts of Nonparametric Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
83
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
83
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, in the presence of general heteroskedasticity, Lehmann and Stein (1949) and Pratt and Gibbons (1981) show that sign methods are the only possible way of producing valid inference in finite samples; see also Dufour and Hallin (1991) and Dufour (2003). If a test has level α for testing the null hypothesis that observations are independent each with a distribution symmetric about zero, then its level must be equal to α conditional on the absolute values of the observations: in other words, it must be a sign test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, in the presence of general heteroskedasticity, Lehmann and Stein (1949) and Pratt and Gibbons (1981) show that sign methods are the only possible way of producing valid inference in finite samples; see also Dufour and Hallin (1991) and Dufour (2003). If a test has level α for testing the null hypothesis that observations are independent each with a distribution symmetric about zero, then its level must be equal to α conditional on the absolute values of the observations: in other words, it must be a sign test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), of the Pitman asymptotic relative efficiency (ARE) of Wilcoxon (i.e., linear scores) rank tests with respect to their normal-theory competitors (namely, standard two-sample t-tests) is .864. In other words, Wilcoxon tests, asymptotically never-that is, whatever the distribution of the underlying noise-need more than 14.6% observations more than t-tests to achieve the same power (see, e.g., Pratt and Gibbons [4] for a more formal definition of ARE).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this is not that the uniform dominance of normal-score rank procedures over parametric Gaussian ones is some kind of miracle that is specific to univariate location models, but rather that rank-based methods for a long time have been essentially limited to statistical models involving univariate independent observations. Except for a few exceptions (such as testing against bivariate dependence, tests based on runs, tests for scale, or goodness-of-fit methods that do not address any specific alternative), classical monographs (Hájek andŠidák [5] and Hájek,Šidák, and Sen [6]; Lehmann [7]; Randles and Wolfe [8]; Pratt and Gibbons [4]; Hettmansperger [9]; Puri and Sen [10]-to quote only a few) mainly deal with single-response linear models with independent errors: one-and two-sample location, analysis of variance, regression, etc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivities of single or multiple cytologic examinations, CUC, and BWFCM were compared using the standard binomial test for two-way tables (11). This statistical test accounts for overlap in detection by various techniques and is more sensitive than direct comparison of overall detection sensitivities.…”
Section: Estimates and Comparison Of Sensitivitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%