2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-007-9485-0
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concepts in modelling N2O emissions from land use

Abstract: Modelling nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions from soil is challenging because multiple biological processes are involved that each respond differently to various environmental and soil factors. Soil water content, organic carbon, temperature and pH are often used in models that predict N 2 O emissions, yet for each of these factors there are concepts that are not fully understood. Though a ubiquitous measure of soil water for models, the application of functions based on water filled pore space across soils that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
129
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
6
129
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, comparing the response of processes to water content across different soils is difficult because different metrics can be used, and water content is usually a proxy for several factors that influence process rates. With respect to N 2 O emissions and soil water metrics, some progress has been made since Farquharson and Baldock (2008) highlighted this issue, with metrics such as volumetric water content and relative diffusivity providing improvements in explaining N 2 O emissions (Castellano et al 2010;van der Weerden et al 2012;Balaine et al 2013;Klefoth et al 2015;Jamali et al 2016). Ultimately, the modelling of oxygen demand and transport (Cook et al 2013) is likely to provide the best prospects for improving simulations of N 2 O dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, comparing the response of processes to water content across different soils is difficult because different metrics can be used, and water content is usually a proxy for several factors that influence process rates. With respect to N 2 O emissions and soil water metrics, some progress has been made since Farquharson and Baldock (2008) highlighted this issue, with metrics such as volumetric water content and relative diffusivity providing improvements in explaining N 2 O emissions (Castellano et al 2010;van der Weerden et al 2012;Balaine et al 2013;Klefoth et al 2015;Jamali et al 2016). Ultimately, the modelling of oxygen demand and transport (Cook et al 2013) is likely to provide the best prospects for improving simulations of N 2 O dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, volumes of air and water in soil at given values of WFP will be influenced by the bulk density of the soil (Castellano et al 2010). As such, Farquharson and Baldock (2008) proposed that VWC is more appropriate for estimating the spatial and temporal variability of N 2 O emissions for different soils, and further supported by van der Weerden et al (2012). In our study, relationships between VWC and WFP and N 2 O emissions were consistently weak but almost identical for each site, sampling location and season with the exception of winter, when VWC was more strongly correlated.…”
Section: Temporal and Spatial Variability Of N 2 O Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Therefore, when we change crops and associated N fertilizer application, it will lead to different NO x emissions. Qin et al [28] developed an agroecosystem model (AgTEM) that was incorporated with biogeochemical and ecophysiological processes. They found that N 2 O emitted from croplands with high N application rates is mostly larger than those with lower N input levels.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%