1973
DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(73)90003-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concepts and words in the 18-month-old: Acquiring concept names under controlled conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A great deal of research can be seen as having addressed such questions. For instance, numerous studies have investigated the process whereby children extend the novel words to untrained referents (Nelson & Bonvillian 1973;Oviatt 1982;Samuelson & Smith 1999). Others have examined the rate of acquisition as a function of the child's referential or non-referential orientation (e.g.…”
Section: Functional Aspects Of Word Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A great deal of research can be seen as having addressed such questions. For instance, numerous studies have investigated the process whereby children extend the novel words to untrained referents (Nelson & Bonvillian 1973;Oviatt 1982;Samuelson & Smith 1999). Others have examined the rate of acquisition as a function of the child's referential or non-referential orientation (e.g.…”
Section: Functional Aspects Of Word Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Congruent with this conceptual risk viewpoint is Wallach & Kogan's (1965) finding that broad categorizing children (tenyear-old) relative to their narrow categorizing peers were more willing to tolerate deviant instances in the sense of offering a larger number of unusual responses to creativity tasks. The latter finding receives independent support in the longitudinal research of Nelson and Bonvillian (1973;) based on young children over the age period of 2\ to \\. Concept over-generalization (breadth) correlated significantly (r = .58) across the two-year period.…”
Section: Representative Research Findingsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…It establishes the behavioral effects of modifiers by a process that does not require the repeated reinforcement of a specific response to the non-verbal stimulus of the ostensive events, e.g., the giraffe. Frequently, even a single exposure to an ostensive pairing event is sufficient to establish a word as a modifier of action frames (see, e.g., Nelson & Bonvillian, 1973). To be sure, whenever the child correctly responds to a combination of an action frame with a modifier, e.g., to 'Give giraffe,' 'Drop Jones-plug' or 'Point to shoe,' we usually reinforce the correct response.…”
Section: Ostensive Expressions As Modifiersmentioning
confidence: 93%