2008
DOI: 10.2511/rpsd.33.1-2.75
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concepts and Issues Related to Choice Making and Autonomy among Persons with Severe Disabilities

Abstract: This paper discusses issues related to concepts of preferences and choice making among persons with severe disabilities. Included are suggestions for acknowledging preferences, teaching choice as a decision-making process, and the broader implications of choice making among persons with severe handicaps as an expression of personal autonomy and dignity. Directions for future research are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past it was common for people with learning disabilities to have little or no choice generally, not merely in regard to food issues (Guess et al 1985). Following the adoption of the tenets of 'normalization' and 'social role valorization' (Nirje 1972;Tyne 1981;Wolfensberger 1972Wolfensberger , 1983 large-scale institutions closed and gradually people with learning disabilities came to live in smaller groups and in individual tenancies, and for support to be more personcentred.…”
Section: Choice For People With Learning Disabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past it was common for people with learning disabilities to have little or no choice generally, not merely in regard to food issues (Guess et al 1985). Following the adoption of the tenets of 'normalization' and 'social role valorization' (Nirje 1972;Tyne 1981;Wolfensberger 1972Wolfensberger , 1983 large-scale institutions closed and gradually people with learning disabilities came to live in smaller groups and in individual tenancies, and for support to be more personcentred.…”
Section: Choice For People With Learning Disabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This conflict is recognized in the recent Green Paper on social care, Independence, Well-Being and Choice, which acknowledges the need for a debate about managing issues of choice against the protection of vulnerable adults such that choice is not invariably sacrificed to the goal of protecting individuals from risk (DH, 2005;see Beamer &Brooks, 2001 andGuess et al, 1985 for discussions of this issue). But risk is not the only agenda that might conflict with goals of choice and empowerment, and the Green Paper recognizes that staff can be under pressure from several different directions.…”
Section: ) Conflicting Agendas and Inspection Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suggestions for overcoming these sorts of problems do appear in the literature in the form of carefully controlled behavioural experiments in which people learn to use symbols, objects or microswitches to express preferences (eg Cooper & Browder, 1998;Guess et al, 1985;Lancioni et al, 1998;Nozaki & Mochizuki, 1995), or in recommendations to supporters to gather evidence to support interpretations (Edge, 2001;Grove et al, 2000;Puddicombe, 1995), and to treat behaviours as having meaning using developmental models (eg Grove et al, 1999). However, these strategies require either a degree of specialist knowledge or a culture of consistency, debate and evaluation which may be lacking in many services for people with severe communication difficulties.…”
Section: ) Communication Difficultiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers share the opinion that independence, understood as a combination of self-determination and self-care, is a key competence which can even improve one's state of health (Guess, Benson & Siegel-Causey, 2008). Research in this field (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%