2003
DOI: 10.1177/026921630301700721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concepts and definitions: a source of confusion in the euthanasia debate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,20 Within the context of a public information day, Gallagher 21 found that almost half of people thought that treatment withdrawal was euthanasia and an Oregon study revealed much confusion in patients about their end-of-life options. 15 For some, [22][23][24][25] such confusion may be understandable because they believe that there is no moral distinction between acts or omissions that result in death. They contend that "passive" and "active" euthanasia are morally equivalent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,20 Within the context of a public information day, Gallagher 21 found that almost half of people thought that treatment withdrawal was euthanasia and an Oregon study revealed much confusion in patients about their end-of-life options. 15 For some, [22][23][24][25] such confusion may be understandable because they believe that there is no moral distinction between acts or omissions that result in death. They contend that "passive" and "active" euthanasia are morally equivalent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45 Clarity about the concept of PAD was important to ensure we were talking about the same practices as even within the literature there is confusion around the terminology of euthanasia. 46,47 In order to direct the discussion to the specific actions of PAD, we defined the two practices of euthanasia and physician aid-in dying within the course of the interviews. 15 Despite this, ambiguities were clear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%