International Handbook of Giftedness and Talent 2000
DOI: 10.1016/b978-008043796-5/50002-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptions of Giftedness from a Meta-Theoretical Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
76
0
15

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
76
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Heller (2004) suggests that this controversy is observed in four main topics: (i) variables included in this diagnosis (what to assess), (ii) why to assess (aims), (iii) with which methods and instruments should we make this assessment (informants), and (iv) when to assess (phases in the development). Concerning the variables to assess, in the psychometric paradigm the emphasis is placed on the identification of potentials or internal capacities, while in the paradigm of the expert-novice relevance is placed on the characteristics of personality, motivation, and the sociocultural conditions that set the basis for development and achievement; however, various authors suggest the complementarity of paradigms in the assessment of gifted students (Gagné, 2009;Heller, Perleth, & Lim, 2005;Renzulli & Gaesser, 2015;Sternberg, 2003;Ziegler & Heller, 2000). Focusing on the superior capacity of these students, it is important to look beyond the cognitive dimensions that are considered in the assessment, not confining giftedness to high scores in IQ tests (Chart et al, 2008;Naglieri & Kaufman, 2001;Pereira, Gaspar, Simões, & Lopes, 2006;Pereira, Seabra-Santos, & Simões, 2003;Robinson & Harrison, 2005).…”
Section: Procedures For the Advancement Of Psychological Assessment Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heller (2004) suggests that this controversy is observed in four main topics: (i) variables included in this diagnosis (what to assess), (ii) why to assess (aims), (iii) with which methods and instruments should we make this assessment (informants), and (iv) when to assess (phases in the development). Concerning the variables to assess, in the psychometric paradigm the emphasis is placed on the identification of potentials or internal capacities, while in the paradigm of the expert-novice relevance is placed on the characteristics of personality, motivation, and the sociocultural conditions that set the basis for development and achievement; however, various authors suggest the complementarity of paradigms in the assessment of gifted students (Gagné, 2009;Heller, Perleth, & Lim, 2005;Renzulli & Gaesser, 2015;Sternberg, 2003;Ziegler & Heller, 2000). Focusing on the superior capacity of these students, it is important to look beyond the cognitive dimensions that are considered in the assessment, not confining giftedness to high scores in IQ tests (Chart et al, 2008;Naglieri & Kaufman, 2001;Pereira, Gaspar, Simões, & Lopes, 2006;Pereira, Seabra-Santos, & Simões, 2003;Robinson & Harrison, 2005).…”
Section: Procedures For the Advancement Of Psychological Assessment Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is as yet no consensus on what is meant by the term "gifted", although there are multiple efforts of trying to create models, which in different ways include components such as the g-factor, motivation, creativity, task commitment, problemsolving, domain specificity, expertise, the traditional nature -nurture problem, and so on (for an overview of this complex issue see Davidson, 1986 andZiegler &Heller, 2000). However, while giftedness may well comprise all of these components, and more, we must not forget also, that giftedness is invariably a social construct.…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When giftedness is defined as a great performance (Subotnik & Jarvin, 2005) or as developing expertise (Sternberg, 2001), and creative development as the acquired expertise (Simonton, 2000), it comes as no surprise to find support for identifying and assessing creativity as a component of giftedness (see Kaufman, Plucker, & Russell, 2012). Gifted education, regardless of its many conceptions (see Ziegler & Heller, 2000), exhibits intense interest in creativity research not only because creativity is a construct in its theories and lifespan models (see Renzulli, 1978Renzulli, , 1986Renzulli, , 2011Subotnik, Olszewski-Kubilius, & Worrell, 2011;Winner, 2000), but also because it is, to reiterate once more, a desired educational objective. That brings us a little closer to the aim of this study.…”
Section: Brought To You By | Mit Librariesmentioning
confidence: 99%