2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)04694-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conception, early pregnancy loss, and time to clinical pregnancy: a population-based prospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

29
319
4
26

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 506 publications
(378 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
29
319
4
26
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies on monitored pregnancies demonstrate that up to 30% of all pregnancies end with a fetal loss (spontaneous abortion or early pregnancy loss) (22). However, in our study, we could only account for those fetal losses that were reported by the patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Previous studies on monitored pregnancies demonstrate that up to 30% of all pregnancies end with a fetal loss (spontaneous abortion or early pregnancy loss) (22). However, in our study, we could only account for those fetal losses that were reported by the patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Studies from 1988 63 onwards have produced more consistent data indicating early/occult loss of approximately 20% ( Figure 3). In the three largest studies 63, 66, 70 pregnancies were clinically recognised only if they lasted ≥6 weeks after the onset of the last menstrual period 66, 75 . Hence, early pregnancy losses in these studies included those lost up to approximately two weeks after a missed menstrual period: this may influence comparison of study results 34, 73 .…”
Section: What the Data Saymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We felt this choice was justified as conception delay has been empirically shown to be a very good marker of identifying which couples will need clinical evaluation and/or treatment. While there have only been a few studies that have followed couples from discontinuing contraception through 12 months of trying, the data demonstrate that 76–90% of couples who do become pregnant do so within the first 6 months of trying (Gnoth et al ., 2003; Wang et al ., 2003; Buck Louis et al ., 2009, 2011). Moreover, clinical guidance suggests that couples seek care if not pregnant within 6 months of trying when the female partner is 35+ years of age.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, important limitations need to be considered including our reliance on 24‐h motility measures in light of at home semen collection, the potential for chance findings and residual confounding given the study's observational design. Also, we opted to use analytical techniques for impaired fecundity (time‐to‐pregnancy > 6 cycles) rather than infertility (time‐to‐pregnancy > 12 cycles), given that most (68–90%) couples trying for pregnancy do so within 6 months as observed in prospective pregnancy studies with preconception enrolment and 12 months of follow‐up (Gnoth et al ., 2003; Wang et al ., 2003; Buck Louis et al ., 2009, 2014). Also, couples may not wait 12 months before seeking clinical care.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%