1999
DOI: 10.21236/ada367318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concept Phase Evaluation of the Microvision, Inc. Aircrew Integrated Helmet System HGU-56P Virtual Retinal Display,

Abstract: Qualified requesters Qualified requesters may obtain copies from the Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC), Cameron Station, Alexandria, Virginia 223 14. Orders will be expedited if placed through the librarian or other person designated to request documents from DTIC. Change of address Organizations receiving reports from the U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory on automatic mailing lists should confirm correct address when corresponding about laboratory reports. Disposition Destroy this document w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Discussion: The contrast was rather uniform but proved to be somewhat less than measured previously by Rash, et al (1999). They measured an average lateral contrast of 17.8 and a vertical contrast of 16.7.…”
Section: Contrastmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Discussion: The contrast was rather uniform but proved to be somewhat less than measured previously by Rash, et al (1999). They measured an average lateral contrast of 17.8 and a vertical contrast of 16.7.…”
Section: Contrastmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Results: Figure 4 shows the exit pupil captured from the left side compared to the exit pupil captured from the same side during the previous testing (Rash et al, 1999). The current exit pupil is more uniform than the previous sample.…”
Section: System Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Helmet-mounted display (HMD), scanning laser display, spatial resolution, modulation transfer function (MTF), contrast, (Rash et al, 1999) and 2001-06 (Harding et al, 2001) provided evaluations of earlier versions of the Microvision, Inc., HMD. This report constitutes the findings of an evaluation of the Phase II HMD, which incorporates design improvements into the earlier versions.…”
Section: Subject Terms (Continue On Reverse If Necessary and Identifymentioning
confidence: 99%