1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0968-0160(97)00021-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concept of the Sharpey screw

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When comparing the sti ness obtained with the BPTB graft to that of the hamstring tendon when the strands are directly xed inside the tunnel walls, both bioabsorbable interference screws [52,61,63,71] and the titanium RCI screw [39,40,49,58] (Smith and Nephew Inc.) have been employed. Aune et al [39] measured the stiness of an RCI screw and semitendinosus graft at 22 N/mm, in comparison with 46 N/mm produced with the BPTB graft.…”
Section: Sti Nessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When comparing the sti ness obtained with the BPTB graft to that of the hamstring tendon when the strands are directly xed inside the tunnel walls, both bioabsorbable interference screws [52,61,63,71] and the titanium RCI screw [39,40,49,58] (Smith and Nephew Inc.) have been employed. Aune et al [39] measured the stiness of an RCI screw and semitendinosus graft at 22 N/mm, in comparison with 46 N/mm produced with the BPTB graft.…”
Section: Sti Nessmentioning
confidence: 99%