1979
DOI: 10.1080/00207547908919600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concept of a manufacturing system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
101
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evolution of integrated controls together with the wider exploration of process flow system design concepts established an intellectually sound methodology for taking a total view of strategically guided complex systems made up of many linked and related specialized functional elements (Parnaby andTowill 2009). Forrester (1961) emphasized the role of connectance, feedback and disturbances in manufacturing systems.…”
Section: The Origins Of the Forridge Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evolution of integrated controls together with the wider exploration of process flow system design concepts established an intellectually sound methodology for taking a total view of strategically guided complex systems made up of many linked and related specialized functional elements (Parnaby andTowill 2009). Forrester (1961) emphasized the role of connectance, feedback and disturbances in manufacturing systems.…”
Section: The Origins Of the Forridge Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(pp. 74-75) QSAM utilises a structured modelling framework that can be traced back to the original concept of a manufacturing system developed by Parnaby (1979), which was exploited by Edgehill, Ols-mats and Towill (1988) within a UK industrial context. A key characteristic of this framework is that it endeavours to achieve an optimum compromise between qualitative and quantitative methods of management theory research, by making maximum use of resources (primarily) in fieldbased activities in the search for 'meaning of evidence' (Eisenhardt, 1989).…”
Section: Design Sciences Via Quick Scan Audit Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supply chain objectives are rarely fully met because of the individual behavior of decision makers in firms along the supply chain, as their behavior is neither optimal nor rational (Parnaby 1979). Due to the dynamic nature of the supply chain, amplifications and fluctuations occur from suppliers all the way down the chain (Sterman 1989).…”
Section: The Role Of Logistics Providers In Handling Supply Chain Dynmentioning
confidence: 99%