2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concept mapping of diet and physical activity: Uncovering local stakeholders perception in the Quebec City region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the literature [21, 33, 37, 39, 55, 56] and to enhance the exploitation of findings for decision making directing future strategic plans, the mean ratings of the modifiability (x-axis) and population-level effect (y-axis) for the youth, adult, and older adult populations were used to plot the position of each factor relative to all other factors. The resulting scatterplots identified four quadrants (e.g., I, II, III, and IV) of “Go-Zones”, reporting factors deemed relevant for their population-level effect but considered to have a low modifiability (Quadrant I), factors that have been attributed low ratings for both modifiability and population-level effect (Quadrant II), factors deemed relevant for their modifiability but considered to have a low population-level effect (Quadrant III), and factors deemed to be most modifiable and having the highest population-level effect (Quadrant IV), respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the literature [21, 33, 37, 39, 55, 56] and to enhance the exploitation of findings for decision making directing future strategic plans, the mean ratings of the modifiability (x-axis) and population-level effect (y-axis) for the youth, adult, and older adult populations were used to plot the position of each factor relative to all other factors. The resulting scatterplots identified four quadrants (e.g., I, II, III, and IV) of “Go-Zones”, reporting factors deemed relevant for their population-level effect but considered to have a low modifiability (Quadrant I), factors that have been attributed low ratings for both modifiability and population-level effect (Quadrant II), factors deemed relevant for their modifiability but considered to have a low population-level effect (Quadrant III), and factors deemed to be most modifiable and having the highest population-level effect (Quadrant IV), respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cluster analysis presents how the statements are grouped or ‘clustered’ together based on the average sorting by the participants. The research team determined the final cluster number keeping in mind parsimony, the theoretical meaning of each cluster, and interpretability (Kane & Trochim, 2007; Lebel et al, 2011). To identify the label for each cluster, the research team reviewed the statements within each cluster while independently; two volunteer study participants developed a label for each cluster that represented its main theme.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concept maps have also been used to develop eLearning materials (Martínez‐Torres, Toral, & Barrero, ), workplace health interventions (Reavley et al., ), and support programs for diverse sexual minority youth (Davis, Saltzburg, & Locke, ). The method has been used with health care and education staff to identify key influences on diet and the physical activity of local residents (Lebel et al., ), provide guidance for therapy in post‐secondary institutions (Kadambi, Audet, & Knish, ), and assess adult learners in undergraduate professional education courses (Hay, Tan, & Whaites, ). Other groups that have participated in concept mapping include post‐secondary students (Phinney & Smith, ), medical patients (Nalavany, Carawan, & Rennick, ), as well as professionals (Lim, ), and seniors (Conrad et al., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%