2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jterra.2020.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concept evaluations of three novel forwarders for gentler forest operations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, pendulum arm technology obtained promising results in terms of rutting, but rubber tracks obtained the most encouraging results. In fact, rubber tracks used under loaded conditions were able to lower rut depth by up to three times as compared to conventional tracks [88], highlighting the importance to distribute the applied load. In this context, the response of tracks in relation to wheels of crawler tractors on soils exposed to different conditions of slope and traffic, caused significantly lower increases of bulk density and rutting [79,[89][90][91].…”
Section: Technical Featuresmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In fact, pendulum arm technology obtained promising results in terms of rutting, but rubber tracks obtained the most encouraging results. In fact, rubber tracks used under loaded conditions were able to lower rut depth by up to three times as compared to conventional tracks [88], highlighting the importance to distribute the applied load. In this context, the response of tracks in relation to wheels of crawler tractors on soils exposed to different conditions of slope and traffic, caused significantly lower increases of bulk density and rutting [79,[89][90][91].…”
Section: Technical Featuresmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The 20 m radius of curvature was fairly wide, and there was very little difference in the level of rut formation between straight and curved trails. In this, the present study differed from a study by Gelin and Björheden (2020), where the curved trail had smaller turning radii, oscillating steering angle (S-bend) and 8 to 10 passes. In addition, the load size in the study by Gelin and Björheden (2020) was roughly double the load in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In this, the present study differed from a study by Gelin and Björheden (2020), where the curved trail had smaller turning radii, oscillating steering angle (S-bend) and 8 to 10 passes. In addition, the load size in the study by Gelin and Björheden (2020) was roughly double the load in the present study. Both more challenging test trail conditions and a heavier load mass are likely to cause more soil shearing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The linear motors have a force limit of 270 kN and the torque limit at articulation joints and wheel motors are set to 50 kNm and 20 kNm, respectively [5]. The Xt28 model has a mass of 16 800 kg [6], where the centre of mass position of each body was estimated to match that of the physical vehicle.…”
Section: Xt28 Forwarder Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An attractive alternative is to use actively articulated suspensions and individual wheel control. These have the potential to reduce the energy consumption and ground damage, yet increase traversability and tip over stability [11,6,21,10,9]. The concepts have been a reappearing topic in planetary exploration, military, construction, agriculture, and forestry applications, but not yet reached the maturity of practical use [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%