2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(02)00309-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concept and development of an orthotropic FE model of the proximal femur

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many researches [13,16,[18][19][20][21] have not considered the anisotropy of the femoral bone, although numerous experiments have proven that the femur has no isotropic elasticity properties [14,25,26]. In order to have a realistic simulation of the load distribution in the femur, a description of the bone elasticity properties as exact as possible is crucial.…”
Section: Fig 1 Loading Of the Femur (Data Obtained From Reference [17])mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researches [13,16,[18][19][20][21] have not considered the anisotropy of the femoral bone, although numerous experiments have proven that the femur has no isotropic elasticity properties [14,25,26]. In order to have a realistic simulation of the load distribution in the femur, a description of the bone elasticity properties as exact as possible is crucial.…”
Section: Fig 1 Loading Of the Femur (Data Obtained From Reference [17])mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical relations between the orthotropic constants and bone density have been suggested by several authors [29][30][31][32][33][34]. Nevertheless, the determination of material trajectories related to the trabecular orientations from clinical quantitative computed tomography (QCT) scans remains an open question [64,71,74,86].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This CAD-based approach has some distinct disadvantages as shown by Young et al [58] in an analysis of studies conducted by Viceconti et al [59], Schmitt et al [60], and Wirtz et al [61] in deriving medical computational models from raw medical data. The AutoCAD-based meshing algorithms were time-intensive compared to automated mesh generation algorithms and that a satisfactory model could not be generated without a significant degree of manual post-processing.…”
Section: Kubit and Rapidform Xor Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%