Concept and application of implant connection systems: Part I. Placement and restoration of internal conical connection implant

Ko, Kyung‐Ho; Kang, Hyeon-Goo; Huh, Yoon‐Hyuk; Park, Chan-Jin; Cho, Lee‐Ra

doi:10.14368/jdras.2020.36.4.211

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The frequently used internal conical connection implant system, internal indexed fixtures, and engaging abutments enhance the stability of the prosthesis by allowing the abutment’s connection to the exact location. However, the insertion or removal of non-parallel ISFDPs can be challenging [ 2 , 6 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Finite Element Analysis of a New Non-Engaging Abutment System for Three-Unit Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

(1) Background: The stability of implants plays a significant role in the success of osseointegration. The stability of the connection between the fixture and the abutment is one of the critical factors affecting osseointegration. When restoring multiple, non-parallel, and splinted implants, achieving a passive fit can be complicated and challenging. A new EZ post non-engaging abutment system of the BlueDiamond® (BD) implant allows a wide connection angle while achieving a passive prosthesis fit. This study aimed to confirm the new abutment system’s clinical applicability by evaluating its biomechanical characteristics using finite element analysis (FEA). (2) Methods: The implant-supported fixed three-unit dental prostheses model was reproduced for two groups of AnyOne® (AO) and BD implants using FEA. The loading conditions were a preload of 200 N in the first step and loads of 100 N (axial), 100 N (15°), or 30 N (45°) in the second step. (3) Results: The peak Von Mises stress (PVMS) value of the fixture in the BD group was more than twice that in the AO group. In contrast, the PVMS values of the abutment and abutment screws were lower in the BD group than in the AO group. The AO group revealed higher maximal principal stress (MPS) values than that of the BD group in the cortical bone, cancellous bone, and crown. The average stress of the outer surface of the abutment was lower in the AO group than in the BD group. The stress distribution for the inner surface of the fixture confirmed that the BD group displayed a lower stress distribution than the AO group under axial and 15° loads; however, the average stress was 1.5 times higher at the 45° load. The stress values of the entire surface where the cortical and cancellous bone were in contact with the fixture were measured. The AO group showed a higher stress value than the BD group in both cortical and cancellous bone. (4) Conclusions: In the AO group, the PVMS value of the fixture and the stress distribution at the contact surface between the fixture and the abutment were lower than those of the BD group, suggesting that the stability of the fixture would be high. However, due to the high stress in the fastening area of the abutment and abutment screw, the risk of abutment fracture in the AO group is higher than that of the BD group. Therefore, the new EZ post non-engaging abutment of the BD implant can be used without any problems in clinics, similar to the non-engaging abutment of the AO implant, which has been widely used in clinical practice.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%