2012
DOI: 10.1177/1049909111434976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concept Analysis of Good Death in Terminally Ill Patients

Abstract: The purpose of this concept analysis of good death was to examine the attributes of a good death and explore the changes of the concept over time and its impact on terminally ill patients. The method used for this analysis was the Rodgers' evolutionary method. A literature search was completed using Medline Ovid and Journal Storage (JSTOR).The findings describe the evolution of the good death concept over time from the prehistoric era followed by premodern, modern, and postmodern times. In addition, informatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
77
0
9

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(51 reference statements)
3
77
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…6,7 This concept arose from the hospice movement and has been described as a multifaceted and individualized experience. 8 According to an Institute of Medicine report published 19 years ago, a good death is one that is “free from avoidable distress and suffering for patient, family, and caregivers, in general accord with the patient’s and family’s wishes, and reasonably consistent with clinical, cultural, and ethical standards.” 9 This concept has received some critique in several disciplines, including medicine, psychology, theology, sociology, and anthropology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6,7 This concept arose from the hospice movement and has been described as a multifaceted and individualized experience. 8 According to an Institute of Medicine report published 19 years ago, a good death is one that is “free from avoidable distress and suffering for patient, family, and caregivers, in general accord with the patient’s and family’s wishes, and reasonably consistent with clinical, cultural, and ethical standards.” 9 This concept has received some critique in several disciplines, including medicine, psychology, theology, sociology, and anthropology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 According to an Institute of Medicine report published 19 years ago, a good death is one that is “free from avoidable distress and suffering for patient, family, and caregivers, in general accord with the patient’s and family’s wishes, and reasonably consistent with clinical, cultural, and ethical standards.” 9 This concept has received some critique in several disciplines, including medicine, psychology, theology, sociology, and anthropology. 6 In particular, concern has been raised that there is no such thing as an external criterion of a good death and that it is more dependent on the perspectives of the dying individual. 10 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mak und Clinton [19] zeigen, dass der Begriff des "guten Sterbens" am häufigsten verwendet wird. Eine Annäherung an das, was unter dem Begriff des "guten Sterbens" verstanden wird, ist durch eine Beschreibung der Attribute, die aus Sicht von Patienten und Versorgern ein gutes Sterben auszeichnen, zu erlangen [14]. …”
Section: Stand Der Forschungunclassified
“…There is a growing body of evidence exploring end-of-life experience and the attributes of a ‘good death’ with general consensus being reached on the complexity of managing dying due to its multidimensional nature 1 2. Such complexity has been argued to result in care providers prioritising medical aspects of care over non-clinical aspects such as the social and psychological experience of dying, a critical issue that the study by Holdsworth seeks to address.…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%