2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2012.03.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concentric elliptical jet diffusion flames with co- and cross-flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is illustrated with the aid of the vortical patterns in Figure 5. As recently found by Kashkousha et al., 17 when the inner velocity is larger than the outer velocity (which is the case here for an inverse diffusion flame where the air jet velocity in the central hole becomes higher) the optimum angular orientation is 35°. This is due to the favorable combination of having relative positions of 0° (whereby the entrainment vortices for the two elliptical jets are counteracting to produce the maximum shearing strain) and 90° (whereby the inner jet major axis tips become closer to the surrounding flow thus providing a smaller flow gap for enlarging the axial velocity strain).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is illustrated with the aid of the vortical patterns in Figure 5. As recently found by Kashkousha et al., 17 when the inner velocity is larger than the outer velocity (which is the case here for an inverse diffusion flame where the air jet velocity in the central hole becomes higher) the optimum angular orientation is 35°. This is due to the favorable combination of having relative positions of 0° (whereby the entrainment vortices for the two elliptical jets are counteracting to produce the maximum shearing strain) and 90° (whereby the inner jet major axis tips become closer to the surrounding flow thus providing a smaller flow gap for enlarging the axial velocity strain).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Higher strain rates are achievable upon changing the relative angular orientation between the concentric streams. Since this was done on normal diffusion flames (as previously described 17 ), the performance enhancement was obtained upon switching to the inverse diffusion flames (in accordance with the central high velocity air stimulated turbulence). At this stage, the cross-flow provides the stagnation impact that enables the extension of the stable firing limits to involve higher velocities so as to enrich the rates of flow strain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…此外, Fernandes 等人 [12] 对对冲交叉射流进行了 研究, 采用实验手段测量了对冲交叉射流的时均速 度分布和对冲涡结构等特性. Kashkousha 等人 [13] [18,19] . 格子 Boltzmann 方法(LBE)与传统数值…”
Section: 在能源工程领域 气固两相交叉射流中的空气unclassified
“…It was found that elliptic burner diffusion flames when properly employed in elliptic coflow could reduce certain pollutants. Jet diffusion flames of another concentric elliptic burner with co-and cross-flow streams were examined in [25]. Shadow graphic imaging using ultraviolet laser was performed on non-premixed flame issuing from concentric elliptic burner, [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%