Solar Power Plants 1991
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-61245-9_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concentrator Optics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The answer is that astronomical telescopes universally have a small f number (ratio of aperture diameter to focal length), while solar collectors often (usually) have an aperture diameter several times the focal length. This is because stars really are unresolvable extra expense and complication of the CPC array, and the cost of the secondary and of supporting it on multiple (although smaller) towers nearly always result in a non-competitive design (Vant-Hull, 1991).…”
Section: Beam-down Systemsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The answer is that astronomical telescopes universally have a small f number (ratio of aperture diameter to focal length), while solar collectors often (usually) have an aperture diameter several times the focal length. This is because stars really are unresolvable extra expense and complication of the CPC array, and the cost of the secondary and of supporting it on multiple (although smaller) towers nearly always result in a non-competitive design (Vant-Hull, 1991).…”
Section: Beam-down Systemsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There are a lot of correlative factors related to the heliostat field range, for instance, the longitude and latitude of the plant location, the installation elevation of receiver, depression angle of the plane of receiver aperture (Receiver Depression Angle for short), shape and dimension of receiver aperture, tracking error and rocking error of heliostats and so on [4] and [5]. Under the circumstance of ignoring tracking error and rocking error of heliostats, this paper analyzed the relationship between the heliostat field range and the receiver depression angle to obtain the optimal scheme of plant site selection, installed capacity and efficiency based on the assumption that the configuration parameters of receiver and heliostats had been determined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%