1978
DOI: 10.1080/15287397809529700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concentrations of circulating steroids in normal prepubertal and adult male and female humans, chimpanzees, rhesus monkeys, rats, mice, and hamsters: A literature survey

Abstract: Radioimmunoassay (RIA) data on concentrations of circulating steroids in normal prepubertal and adult male and female humans, chimpanzees, rhesus monkeys, rats, mice, and hamsters have been collated from the literature. Few reports include data for both sexes, for age groups, or for more than one species. In selecting references for inclusion in the tables, efforts were made to choose data only from RIA procedures that were adequately validated. A number of similarities can be found by reviewing the tables. Le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the effects of P are dependent on the concentration of estrogens in a variety of physiological events. But the serum concentration of E 2 in rats is lower than that in humans [22] in contrast to the case for P. Thus it is possible that the species differences in the effects of progestins between rats and humans might become apparent when the concentrations of estrogens were decreased after ovariectomy or menopause, even though the differences were not prominent under the conditions of the normal reproductive cycle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the effects of P are dependent on the concentration of estrogens in a variety of physiological events. But the serum concentration of E 2 in rats is lower than that in humans [22] in contrast to the case for P. Thus it is possible that the species differences in the effects of progestins between rats and humans might become apparent when the concentrations of estrogens were decreased after ovariectomy or menopause, even though the differences were not prominent under the conditions of the normal reproductive cycle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…However, we are unaware of the exact mechanism underlying the species differences in the effects of progestins. We can consider the following possibilities: First, the serum concentration of P in rats is generally remarkably higher than that in humans, and this holds true even after ovariectomy [22]. Therefore the contribution of the reduction in serum P concentration after ovariectomy to the change of thermoregulation might be less in rats, compared with humans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we used 5-week-old mice in the peripubertal period to minimize the hormonal variability, these animals have somewhat increased circulating levels of estradiol in the high diestrous range (Overpeck et al 1978), and this may have played a role in triggering the paradoxical anxiogenic effect of THP. Further, the results from the present study may also have relevance for mood swings and irritability, commonly reported at the onset of puberty in association with fluctuations in steroid hormones (Buchanan et al 1992;Cameron 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These animals do not exhibit estrous cyclicity and were used in order to isolate selective effects of THP withdrawal on behavioral state. Circulating levels of estradiol at this time are increasing to within the high diestrous range (Overpeck et al 1978) and are elevated above levels earlier in development. Additional δ knockout mice were bred in-house, and tails genotyped after experimental procedures were completed.…”
Section: Animalsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, in many commonly used and widely accepted rodent models, the utility of the measurement of circulating serum hormone levels alone as an indicator of exposure to androgen-disrupting chemicals is limited. In male laboratory mice and males of several other species, including humans, there is striking intraindividual and interindividual variability in testosterone levels (31)(32)(33)(34). Thus, it is extremely difficult to detect statistically significant differences in steroid hormone levels due to exposure to a xenobiotic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%