1989
DOI: 10.1038/339198a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concentration of sunlight to solar-surface levels using non-imaging optics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the concentration factor of our biconvex lens is 8,600. If we consider that solar concentrators with concentration factors as high as 84,000 have been reported 36,37 , our ZrO 2 samples doped with narrowband lanthanide ions and broadband transition metal ions are also expected to glow under the filtered sunlight that is concentrated at higher factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the concentration factor of our biconvex lens is 8,600. If we consider that solar concentrators with concentration factors as high as 84,000 have been reported 36,37 , our ZrO 2 samples doped with narrowband lanthanide ions and broadband transition metal ions are also expected to glow under the filtered sunlight that is concentrated at higher factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At lower excitation power densities, the NaYF 4 :Yb 3 þ ,Er 3 þ sample performs better. Therefore, we reckon the upconversion by thermal radiation to be more preferable for concentrated solar radiation 36,37 . The different power dependence behaviours between our sample and the NaYF 4 :Yb 3 þ ,Er 3 þ sample are attributed to their distinct upconversion mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crude reflectors adversely affect the ability to focus such large reflectors on the relatively small active area of the detectors. This disadvantage may be mitigated by using non-imaging concentrators [23], provided that the total path difference after these additional optical elements is not more than the specified tolerance (1cm in our example). Beyond these, we can imagine three major types of realizations: arrays with a central tower, arrays without a central tower, and a cross between the two: 1) Central tower, as in STACEE (Solar Tower Atmospheric Čerenkov Effect Experiment [24]): a field of "dumb" mirrors will simply reflect light to a central tower where all light will be detected and processed [1].…”
Section: Realizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effective temperature of the photosphere is estimated to be 5800 K giving 6.4 kW/cm 2 (Noyes 1976). Gleckman et al (1989) give the flux at the sun's surface as 6.3 kW/cm 2 , which corresponds to an effective black-body temperature of 5775 K.…”
Section: The Sun Itselfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the full range of possibilities remains to be established, there is potential for significant impacts on several nationally important problems, such as hazardous waste management, synthesis and processing of high-technology materials, water decontamination, and development of new technologies for international export. Recent advances in solar concentrator technology at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, (NREL) formerly known as the Solar Energy Research Institute, (SERI) (Carasso and Lewandowski 1990), and at the University of Chicago (Gleckman et al 1989;Welford and Winston 1989;Winston 1991) have demonstrated the potential of very high flux density solar furnaces, capable of furnishing peak photon intensities of up to 50,000 times the natural solar insolation at the earth's surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%