2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.eti.2023.103054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concentration of phenolic compounds from olive washing wastewater by forward osmosis using table olive fermentation brine as draw solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from those compounds, a high concentration of organic matter was present in the extract, as reflected by the high sugar and total solids content. The brownish color of the extract was reflected by a high color coefficient in comparison with other olive-derived wastewaters [32]. The slightly acidic pH was attributed to the presence of organic acids, as presented in Figures 3 and 5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Apart from those compounds, a high concentration of organic matter was present in the extract, as reflected by the high sugar and total solids content. The brownish color of the extract was reflected by a high color coefficient in comparison with other olive-derived wastewaters [32]. The slightly acidic pH was attributed to the presence of organic acids, as presented in Figures 3 and 5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The operating conditions for the characterization tests were the same for both membranes, with flow rates of 25 L·h −1 for the FS and 15 L·h −1 for the DS. Then, two tests were carried out to evaluate the prediction of the selected model: ( i ) a test using distilled water as the FS and a concentration of 200 g·L −1 of NaCl for the DS; and ( ii ) a test using 1 g·L −1 of tyrosol as the FS and 30 g·L −1 of NaCl as the DS (see [ 29 ] for the justification of the concentrations used). In the case of the FTSH2O membrane, the FS and the DS were pumped at a flow rate of 30 L·h −1 , while for the HFFO2 membrane, the experiments were carried out at 60 L·h −1 for the FS and 25 L·h −1 for the DS (based on manufacturer recommendations and previous studies carried out by the research group).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, it was the active layer of the membrane facing FS (AL-FS). In this configuration, concentration polarization occurs within the porous FO support layer, called internal concentration polarization (ICP), which causes a decrease in the permeate flux [45,46].…”
Section: Influence Of the Type Of Ds On The Concentration Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, it was the active layer of the membrane facing FS (AL-FS). In this configuration, concentration polarization occurs within the porous FO support layer, called internal concentration polarization (ICP), which causes a decrease in the permeate flux [45,46]. On the other hand, the decision was made to work in counter current mode, as it has been reported to increase driving force compared to parallel operation [47].…”
Section: Influence Of the Type Of Ds On The Concentration Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%