2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(01)00140-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concentration of Mercury, Methylmercury, Cadmium, Lead, Arsenic, and Selenium in the Rain and Stream Water of Two Contrasting Watersheds in Western Maryland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

6
46
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
46
4
Order By: Relevance
“…1), was not significantly higher than at the Molino site which is furthest away from local mercury emission sources (24 km from Crist power plant and 14 km from International Paper). Our results contrast with studies in Michigan and Maryland which found higher mercury deposition in urban areas compared to rural areas (Mason et al, 2000;Lawson and Mason, 2001;Landis et al, 2002;Keeler and Dvonch, 2005) and those finding higher concentrations of mercury in rainwater close to coalfired utilities (White et al, 2009). We did observe seasonal differences, with the highest deposition rate during the summer at Pensacola Bay and MDN sites.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…1), was not significantly higher than at the Molino site which is furthest away from local mercury emission sources (24 km from Crist power plant and 14 km from International Paper). Our results contrast with studies in Michigan and Maryland which found higher mercury deposition in urban areas compared to rural areas (Mason et al, 2000;Lawson and Mason, 2001;Landis et al, 2002;Keeler and Dvonch, 2005) and those finding higher concentrations of mercury in rainwater close to coalfired utilities (White et al, 2009). We did observe seasonal differences, with the highest deposition rate during the summer at Pensacola Bay and MDN sites.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…For example, inputs of mercury (Hg) to a waterbody can be influenced by atmospheric deposition (2), geology (3), soil and vegetation type (4), and large precipitation events (5). Increases in water temperature, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), and sulfate (SO 4 2Ϫ ) and declines in pH can increase in-lake Hg methylation (6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All data are available in Appendix D and Table 5 summarizes the mean, median, and volume-weight concentrations for THg and MMHg. While the mechanism for the presence of MMHg in rainfall is not understood, numerous observations have been made which suggest that it is typically present at levels less than 1.5% of the total mercury in rainfall Ebinghaus et al, 1999;Lawson and Mason, 2001;. Exceptions to this generalization on MMHg levels in rainfall include higher values reported for the Great Lakes area (up to 18%) and in Sweden (3%) .…”
Section: Mercury and Methylmercurymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the mechanism for the presence of MMHg in rainfall is debated in the literature, numerous observations have been made that suggest it is typically present at levels of less than 1.5% of the THg in rainfall Ebinghaus et al 1999;Lawson and Mason 2001;. A current hypothesis for the source of MMHg in precipitation is the abiotic methylation of Hg by carboxylic acids, particularly acetate (Gardfeldt et al 2003;Hammerschmidt et al 2007;Conaway et al 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%