“…As previously reported (DeGrandi-Hoffman et al 2008; Michelette and Engles 1995), EHBs were significantly larger than AHBs: mean head width (3.71 mm versus 3.66 mm, n =113, 100, SE=0.0072, 0.0087; one-way ANOVA, F 1,211 =20.78, p <0.001), body weight with abdomen (0.1107 g versus 0.1098 g, n =113, 100, SE=0.0012, 0.0016; one-way ANOVA, F 1,211 =18.45, p <0.001), and body weight without abdomen (0.0506 g versus 0.0479 g, n =113, 100, SE=0.0004, 0.0004; one-way ANOVA, F 1,211 =23.13, p <0.001). However, across all bees, there was no significant correlation between learning (as percent correct PER) and body size (head size, Pearson’s correlation, r =−0.009, n =213, p =0.892; body mass, Pearson’s correlation, r =0.041, n =213, p =0.549).…”