2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.fbp.2012.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concentration of ethanolic extracts from Sideritis ssp. L. by nanofiltration: Comparison of dead-end and cross-flow modes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another study [35] did not report significant differences in retention when comparing cross-flow and dead-end setups. In both cases, permeance decreased with increased solute loading, which confirmed an influence of mass transfer and suggest at least some concentration polarization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Another study [35] did not report significant differences in retention when comparing cross-flow and dead-end setups. In both cases, permeance decreased with increased solute loading, which confirmed an influence of mass transfer and suggest at least some concentration polarization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The conventional dead-end stirring filtration system was not able to do so. 45 47 By using the filtration system in the present study, the flux before and after cleaning can be measured repeatedly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Permeate flux (J p ) was calculated by eqn 1, where V p is the permeate content accumulated, t is the time needed for accumulating V p , and A m is the effective area of membrane permeation (Mello et al, 2010;Conidi et al, 2012;Machado et al, 2013;Tsibranska & Tylkowski, 2013).…”
Section: Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%