1974
DOI: 10.1002/pol.1974.130120507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concentration effects in gel permeation chromatography with mixed eluents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concentration effects for the oligomers and also for the excluded (high) polymer species are usually small or even negligible. The k c values depend also on the thermodynamic quality of eluent 94 and the correlation was found between the product A 2 M and k c where A 2 is the second virial coefficient of the particular polymer–solvent system (Section 2.2) and M is the polymer molar mass 95. At moderate c i values, the concentration effects may slightly contribute to the reduction of the band‐broadening effects in SEC because the retention volumes for species with the higher molar masses are more reduced than those for the lower molar masses.…”
Section: Problems Of Secmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The concentration effects for the oligomers and also for the excluded (high) polymer species are usually small or even negligible. The k c values depend also on the thermodynamic quality of eluent 94 and the correlation was found between the product A 2 M and k c where A 2 is the second virial coefficient of the particular polymer–solvent system (Section 2.2) and M is the polymer molar mass 95. At moderate c i values, the concentration effects may slightly contribute to the reduction of the band‐broadening effects in SEC because the retention volumes for species with the higher molar masses are more reduced than those for the lower molar masses.…”
Section: Problems Of Secmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, k c values diminish for polymers with excluded molar masses. The dependence of V R on c i is co‐responsible for the mutual shifts of calibration dependences of log V h versus V R for chemically different polymers 94, 115. Increased viscosity of concentrated polymer solutions reduces diffusion rate of macromolecules and, consequently, it hinders mass transfer between the interstitial space and the pore volume.…”
Section: Practical Hintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another complicating factor in the quantitative evaluation of polymer–packing interactions by SEC is the concentration effect, that is, the dependence of elution volumes, V e , on the injected polymer concentration, c 2 . As reported,12,13 the slopes of linear plots of V e vs c 2 strongly depend on the thermodynamic quality of the eluent with respect to the polymer and become higher as the molar mass of the polymer increases, especially for good solvents. As usually found in the literature,11–24 the hydrodynamic volume of the polymer decreases as the injected polymer concentration increases making its V e higher than the one obtained at zero concentration, especially for polymers of high molar mass.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In addition, another factor affecting the quantitative evaluation of polymer–packing interactions in SEC, is the concentration effect, i.e., the dependence of the elution volume on the injected polymer concentration, especially for good solvents. This effect has been mainly interpreted on the basis of hydrodynamic factors 11–24. In this paper, the concentration effect has also been correlated with the preferential solvation phenomenon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For polystyrene, eq 4 yields Ke= 8.135 x 10-2 cm 3 /g, compared to a measured value of 7.023 x 10-2 cm 3 /g. 21 ' 22 In any solvent the intrinsic viscosity of the particular polymer is given by the Mark-Houwink equation with appropriate constants (5) …”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%