The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1967
DOI: 10.1016/0005-2795(67)90397-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concentration difference spectra in the dimerization of insulin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
15
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…difference spectra give information about the interaction between the ligand and the chromophoric side chains of the protein. The changes in the spectra measured between 260 and 300nm are consistent with the perturbation of the tyrosine residues (Rupley et al, 1967;Steinhardt & Reynolds, 1969;Steiner & Weinryb, 1971) arising from the detergent binding. The difference spectra given in Fig.…”
Section: Fig I Precipitation Of Insulin By Cetyltrinmethylammonium supporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…difference spectra give information about the interaction between the ligand and the chromophoric side chains of the protein. The changes in the spectra measured between 260 and 300nm are consistent with the perturbation of the tyrosine residues (Rupley et al, 1967;Steinhardt & Reynolds, 1969;Steiner & Weinryb, 1971) arising from the detergent binding. The difference spectra given in Fig.…”
Section: Fig I Precipitation Of Insulin By Cetyltrinmethylammonium supporting
confidence: 59%
“…2 suggest that the environment of the tyrosine changes to a more apolar character after detergent binding. It has been reported that in solution, when the insulin molecule is in the associated state (dimer or tetramer), the chromophoric side chains interact (Rupley et al, 1967). It has also been shown that in the solid state an aromatic cage consisting of tyrosine and phenylalanine residues is present in the insulin dimer (Blundell et al, 1971).…”
Section: Fig I Precipitation Of Insulin By Cetyltrinmethylammonium mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insulin was injected at two concentration levels of 4.3 or 57.3 μmol L –1 . Given the range of estimates for the dimerization constant depending on pH and ionic strength found in the literature, , we expect the insulin, in the absence of divalent ions, to be mainly monomeric at 4.3 μmol L –1 and to be mainly dimeric at 57.3 μmol L –1 . The mobility of insulin at the latter concentration tends to be slightly higher than that at the former one, which may be caused by a stronger tendency for dimerization at higher protein concentration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although insulin exhibits a strong propensity for selfassociation, at pH 2 and at physiologic concentrations the predominant form may well be monomeric. [40][41][42] It is notable that the insulin molecule can retain transport and antilipolytic activities while coupled to a large polymer which apparently cannot enter the cell. It is perhaps surprising that the particles, which may be even larger than the fat cells, did not restrict more severely the proper interaction of insulin with the cell surface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%