2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c02690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concentration-Dependent Viscoelasticity of Poloxamer-Shelled Microbubbles

Abstract: The oscillation of shelled microbubbles during exposure to ultrasound is influenced by the mechanical properties of the shell components. The oscillation behavior of bubbles coated with various phospholipids and other amphiphiles has been studied. However, there have been few investigations of how the adsorption conditions of the shell molecules relate to the viscoelastic properties of the shell and influence the oscillation behavior of the bubbles. In the present study, we investigated the oscillation charact… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the MB size distribution known, the MB shell stiffness ( S p in N/m) and shell friction ( S f in kg/s) are estimated by fitting a linearized encapsulated MB model proposed by de Jong et al , to the measured attenuation curves. The linearized model has been used extensively in previous literature studies; , it neglects multiple scattering effects and assumes low amplitude bubble oscillations (both of which are reasonable considering the high MB dilution ratios and low acoustic pressure employed in our experiments). For more information about the model, one can refer to previously published literature. , The size distribution of MBs is directly used to obtain the estimated attenuation per unit distance using the following equation α normale normals normalt normali normalm normala normalt normale normald ( r , f ) = 10 ln ( 10 ) r n ( r ) σ s ( r , f ) δ normalt normalo normalt ( r , f ) δ normalr normala normald ( r , f ) Here, n is the MB number density from measurements obtained using Coulter counter, σ s is the scattering cross sections of the MBs, and δ tot is the total damping which is the sum of the radiation (δ rad ), viscous (δ vis ), and shell friction (δ sh ) terms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…With the MB size distribution known, the MB shell stiffness ( S p in N/m) and shell friction ( S f in kg/s) are estimated by fitting a linearized encapsulated MB model proposed by de Jong et al , to the measured attenuation curves. The linearized model has been used extensively in previous literature studies; , it neglects multiple scattering effects and assumes low amplitude bubble oscillations (both of which are reasonable considering the high MB dilution ratios and low acoustic pressure employed in our experiments). For more information about the model, one can refer to previously published literature. , The size distribution of MBs is directly used to obtain the estimated attenuation per unit distance using the following equation α normale normals normalt normali normalm normala normalt normale normald ( r , f ) = 10 ln ( 10 ) r n ( r ) σ s ( r , f ) δ normalt normalo normalt ( r , f ) δ normalr normala normald ( r , f ) Here, n is the MB number density from measurements obtained using Coulter counter, σ s is the scattering cross sections of the MBs, and δ tot is the total damping which is the sum of the radiation (δ rad ), viscous (δ vis ), and shell friction (δ sh ) terms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ultrasound attenuation of the monodisperse lipid-coated MBs is measured through the transmission and reception method. This is a widely accepted method for characterization of the shell properties of MBs. , The schematic representation of our experimental setup is shown in Figure . In our experiments, we either use one pair of 2.25 MHz unfocused transducers (C304-SU, 2.25 MHz, 1″ diameter, Olympus NDT, USA) or one pair of 1 MHz unfocused transducers (C302-SU, 1 MHz, 1″ diameter, Olympus NDT, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations