2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.02749.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concentration‐dependent reversible activation‐inhibition of human butyrylcholinesterase by tetraethylammonium ion

Abstract: Tetraalkylammonium (TAA) salts are well known reversible inhibitors of cholinesterases. However, at concentrations around 10 mm, they have been found to activate the hydrolysis of positively charged substrates, catalyzed by wild‐type human butyrylcholinesterase (EC 3.1.1.8) [Erdoes, E.G., Foldes, F.F., Zsigmond, E.K., Baart, N. & Zwartz, J.A. (1958) Science128, 92]. The present study was undertaken to determine whether the peripheral anionic site (PAS) of human BuChE (Y332, D70) and/or the catalytic substrate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(46 reference statements)
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inhibitory potencies of these separated enantiomers were evaluated, whereby eutomer (−)-2 had an IC 50 of 4.5 nM and was a 3.4-fold more potent huBChE inhibitor than the distomer ( + ) -2 (IC 50  = 15.3 nM). Given the affinity of compound (−)-2 for its target enzyme huBChE, standard methods for K i determination (e.g., Lineweaver-Burk plots) or approximation (e.g., Cheng-Prusoff equations) are inappropriate, as i) the target enzyme huBChE does not obey the typical Michaelis-Menten kinetics34 and ii) the concentration of the inhibitor is approaching the enzyme concentration (50 and 8.2 nM, respectively) in the assay system. This situation is referred to as tight binding inhibition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inhibitory potencies of these separated enantiomers were evaluated, whereby eutomer (−)-2 had an IC 50 of 4.5 nM and was a 3.4-fold more potent huBChE inhibitor than the distomer ( + ) -2 (IC 50  = 15.3 nM). Given the affinity of compound (−)-2 for its target enzyme huBChE, standard methods for K i determination (e.g., Lineweaver-Burk plots) or approximation (e.g., Cheng-Prusoff equations) are inappropriate, as i) the target enzyme huBChE does not obey the typical Michaelis-Menten kinetics34 and ii) the concentration of the inhibitor is approaching the enzyme concentration (50 and 8.2 nM, respectively) in the assay system. This situation is referred to as tight binding inhibition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, at low concentrations of the substrate butyrylthiocholine, hydrolysis can be described by simple Michaelis-Menten kinetics (Amitai et al, 1998). The hydrolysis rate of butyrylthiocholine at intermediate levels exceeds that predicted by Michaelis-Menten kinetics, while very high concentrations of butyrylthiocholine slightly inhibit butyrylcholinesterase (Masson et al, 1996; Masson et al, 1997; Stojan et al, 2002). Within the conditions of the current study, hydrolysis of butyrylthiocholine by butyrylcholinesterase was adequately described by simple Michaelis-Menten kinetics (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Stimulation of BuChE by neutral amines is in contrast with observations made with other BuChE activators, such as choline esters and other tetraalkylammonium salts, compounds that have a permanent cationic moiety (Masson et al, 1999;Stojan et al, 2002). These latter compounds are known to effect activation of BuChE by conformational changes resulting from binding of these cationic compounds to a peripheral anionic site (Masson et al, 1999).…”
Section: Structure-activity Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 79%