2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.115.030505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concentrating Tripartite Quantum Information

Abstract: We introduce the concentrated information of tripartite quantum states. For three parties Alice, Bob, and Charlie, it is defined as the maximal mutual information achievable between Alice and Charlie via local operations and classical communication performed by Charlie and Bob. We derive upper and lower bounds to the concentrated information, and obtain a closed expression for it on several classes of states including arbitrary pure tripartite states in the asymptotic setting. We show that distillable entangle… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
120
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
120
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, it has been used to explain the quantum advantage of many emerging quantum computation tasks, including quantum state merging [6], deterministic quantum computation with one qubit [7], Deutsch-Jozsa algorithm [8], and Grover search algorithm [9]. The resource theory of coherence also provides a basis for interpreting the wave nature of a quantum system [10,11] and the essence of quantum correlations such as quantum entanglement [12][13][14][15][16][17] and various discordlike quantum correlations [7,[17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, it has been used to explain the quantum advantage of many emerging quantum computation tasks, including quantum state merging [6], deterministic quantum computation with one qubit [7], Deutsch-Jozsa algorithm [8], and Grover search algorithm [9]. The resource theory of coherence also provides a basis for interpreting the wave nature of a quantum system [10,11] and the essence of quantum correlations such as quantum entanglement [12][13][14][15][16][17] and various discordlike quantum correlations [7,[17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This follows from the fact that in this situation Bob and Charlie can achieve perfect asymptotic merging for the purification of ρ just by using LOCC [1,2,8]. Moreover, equation (8) also implies that states satisfying equation (7) have nonzero measure in the set of all states, since this is evidently true for states satisfying equation (8).…”
Section: Perfect Asymptotic Pqsmmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In contrast to standard quantum state merging, Bob and Charlie can use unlimited amount of PPT entangled states, see figure 1 for illustration. The situation where Bob and Charlie do not have access to PPT entangled states is known as LOCC quantum state merging (LQSM), and has been introduced in [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do this, Charlie uses an ancillary quantum register R, general state is as σ ABCR = ρ ABC ⊗ρ R , now Bob and Charlie perform an LOCC protocol to maximizes the mutual information between Alice and Charlie. The corresponding maximal mutual information between Alice and Charlie is called concentrated information [27] I(ρ ABC ) = max…”
Section: Concentrated Information and Uncertainty Lower Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be said explicitly that Charlie can improve its uncertainty about Alice's measurement outcomes with the help of Bob. In this case, the CI and the one-way CI is equal, and are given by [27] I(ρ AB ⊗ρ C ) = I → (ρ AB ⊗ρ C ) = I(A: B)−D(A|B), (18) where D(A|B) is quantum discord [29]. We study a case in which Alice, Bob and Charlie share a tripartite state of the following form…”
Section: B Example IImentioning
confidence: 99%