2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2006.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concanavalin A for in vivo glucose sensing: A biotoxicity review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
93
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
1
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dose used in our study has been shown to be safe and no signs of hepatic, hematologic, or any overt toxicity were reported. 55 The interval between treatments was chosen based on the preliminary studies utilizing fluorescently labeled ConA, which was retained in the renal microvasculature for at least 4 days. In the assessment of aortic matrilytic activity, aortic rings were cultured in 3D matrigel for up to 9 days.…”
Section: In Vivo Induction Of Mmp-14 With Conamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dose used in our study has been shown to be safe and no signs of hepatic, hematologic, or any overt toxicity were reported. 55 The interval between treatments was chosen based on the preliminary studies utilizing fluorescently labeled ConA, which was retained in the renal microvasculature for at least 4 days. In the assessment of aortic matrilytic activity, aortic rings were cultured in 3D matrigel for up to 9 days.…”
Section: In Vivo Induction Of Mmp-14 With Conamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing methods of fluorescent glucose sensing apply fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). 45 This method is based on the dual measure, i.e., the FRET and fluorescence intensity (I) measurements. FRET is a distance-dependent energy transfer from a fluorophore donor (D) to a fluorophore acceptor (A) in a nonradiative process.…”
Section: Contact Lens Sensor For Diabetesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ [14,[16][17][18]] that bind to carbohydrate moieties on the cell surface, but especially in the latter case the cell-binding molecules themselves have been reported to have a degree of cytotoxicity that can influence the cellular properties being evaluated. [17,[20][21][22] Thus, while these studies highlight the utility of AFM for the measurement of cell receptor-ligand interactions, an expanded set of cantilever attachment methods will be needed for the study of cell-cell interactions over widely varying time scales.To address this need, we have compared three biomolecule-mediated methods for the attachment of live cells to AFM cantilevers, with an emphasis on the cell viability, adhesion strength, and probe reuse that each technique can achieve. These studies have indicated that cell attachment through the use of complementary DNA strands has the least influence on viability and does not appear to activate cell signaling pathways.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15][16][17][18][19] Several fundamental adhesion measurements have been achieved by coating AFM cantilevers with fibronectin [19] or lectins [14,[16][17][18] that bind to carbohydrate moieties on the cell surface, but especially in the latter case the cell-binding molecules themselves have been reported to have a degree of cytotoxicity that can influence the cellular properties being evaluated. [17,[20][21][22] Thus, while these studies highlight the utility of AFM for the measurement of cell receptor-ligand interactions, an expanded set of cantilever attachment methods will be needed for the study of cell-cell interactions over widely varying time scales.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%