2002
DOI: 10.1002/bip.10280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing the transition state populations in simple protein models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A second approach pursues a severe discretization of conformation-state space that enables the use of masterequation stochastic kinetics (30)(31)(32). Although an exact kinetic description can be obtained, a comprehensive and accurate discretization of configuration space is required.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second approach pursues a severe discretization of conformation-state space that enables the use of masterequation stochastic kinetics (30)(31)(32). Although an exact kinetic description can be obtained, a comprehensive and accurate discretization of configuration space is required.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting scheme can be represented as a graph or network (26). The kinetics on this graph is assumed to be stochastic, leading to a Markovian model for the time dependence of the populations of the various states (10,11,(27)(28)(29)(30). This approach is particularly well suited for reduced lattice models (10, 11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After examining the enthalpies and entropies for the formation for all the possible different base stacks, we find that there are two on-pathway rate-limiting steps corresponding to the formation of the native stacks (3,4,18,19) = (U,C,G,A) and (5,6,16,17) = (G,A,U,C), respectively, and two off-pathway rate-limiting steps, corresponding to the disrupting of the non-native stacks (5,6,11,12) = (G,A,U,C), and (11,12,18,19) = (U,C,G,A). According to these rate-limiting steps, the conformation space can be classified into the following seven clusters: cluster 1 for the 586 conformations without any of the four stacks formed, cluster 2 for the 105 conformations with stack (3,4,18,19), cluster 3 for the 51 conformations with stack (5,6,11,12), cluster 4 for the 76 conformations with stack (5,6,16,17), cluster 5 for the 36 conformations with stack (11,12,18,19), cluster 6 for the five conformations with both stacks (3,4,18,19) and (5,6,11,12), and cluster 7 for the 20 conformations with both stacks (3,4,18,19) and (5,…”
Section: Application To Realistic Rna Folding Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to these rate-limiting steps, the conformation space can be classified into the following seven clusters: cluster 1 for the 586 conformations without any of the four stacks formed, cluster 2 for the 105 conformations with stack (3,4,18,19), cluster 3 for the 51 conformations with stack (5,6,11,12), cluster 4 for the 76 conformations with stack (5,6,16,17), cluster 5 for the 36 conformations with stack (11,12,18,19), cluster 6 for the five conformations with both stacks (3,4,18,19) and (5,6,11,12), and cluster 7 for the 20 conformations with both stacks (3,4,18,19) and (5,6,16,17). The native state is in cluster 7, the fully unfolded state is in cluster 1, and there are three misfolded traps: cluster 3, 5 and 6.…”
Section: Application To Realistic Rna Folding Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation