2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23629-7_37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing the Shape of Brain Networks Using Graph Filtration and Gromov-Hausdorff Metric

Abstract: Abstract.The difference between networks has been often assessed by the difference of global topological measures such as the clustering coefficient, degree distribution and modularity. In this paper, we introduce a new framework for measuring the network difference using the GromovHausdorff (GH) distance, which is often used in shape analysis. In order to apply the GH distance, we define the shape of the brain network by piecing together the patches of locally connected nearest neighbors using the graph filtr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
115
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
115
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, we also have graph filtration for the case of the sequence of nested binary networks [44] …”
Section: B Multiscale Network As Graph Filtrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, we also have graph filtration for the case of the sequence of nested binary networks [44] …”
Section: B Multiscale Network As Graph Filtrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our brain network model, the node sets X and Y is given in the fixed identical locations in the template. Therefore, the node x i ∈ X is simply mapped to y i ∈ Y [44], [57]. Therefore, GH-distance can be trivially discretized as…”
Section: Gromov-hausdorff Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then K d may be used as in Section 2.2 to embed the n images into a d-dimensional Euclidean space. [18]. Nonnegative definite similarity matrices have in recent years been frequently used in statistical model building for images; for a recent example see [31].…”
Section: Image Similarity and Dissimilaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A different take on dissimilarities between functonal brain network images based on FDG-PET scans is found in [18].…”
Section: Image Similarity and Dissimilaritymentioning
confidence: 99%