2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4875730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing the reconnection rate in turbulent kinetic layers by using electron mixing to identify topology

Abstract: Three-dimensional kinetic simulations of magnetic reconnection for parameter regimes relevant to the magnetopause current layer feature the development of turbulence, driven by the magnetic and velocity shear, and dominated by coherent structures including flux ropes, current sheets, and flow vortices. Here, we propose a new approach for computing the global reconnection rate in the presence of this complexity. The mixing of electrons originating from separate sides of the magnetopause layer is used as a proxy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
162
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
15
162
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent 2-D and 3-D kinetic simulations demonstrated that repeated formation of secondary small-scale flux ropes near the X-line and within the reconnection exhausts drastically disturb steady reconnection features (e.g., Daughton et al, 2006;Fujimoto and Sydora, 2012;Lapenta et al, 2015). Furthermore, recent 3-D fully kinetic simulations also demonstrated that when considering the strong guide field component, similar turbulent features easily spread even outside these regions and fill the whole reconnection layer through the copious formation of oblique secondary flux ropes (Daughton et al, 2011(Daughton et al, , 2014. Spacecraft observations using Cluster indeed indicated the existence of turbulence near the X-line in the magnetotail (Eastwood et al, 2009).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent 2-D and 3-D kinetic simulations demonstrated that repeated formation of secondary small-scale flux ropes near the X-line and within the reconnection exhausts drastically disturb steady reconnection features (e.g., Daughton et al, 2006;Fujimoto and Sydora, 2012;Lapenta et al, 2015). Furthermore, recent 3-D fully kinetic simulations also demonstrated that when considering the strong guide field component, similar turbulent features easily spread even outside these regions and fill the whole reconnection layer through the copious formation of oblique secondary flux ropes (Daughton et al, 2011(Daughton et al, , 2014. Spacecraft observations using Cluster indeed indicated the existence of turbulence near the X-line in the magnetotail (Eastwood et al, 2009).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(d) 3D simulations, despite exhibiting great differences in the structure of the reconnec-tion layer, give reconnection rates similar to those of 2D simulations (e.g., Daughton et al 2014;Guo et al 2015).…”
Section: Thoughts On the Interpretation Of This Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(e) Simulations in turbulent scenarios lead to current sheets characterized by the same reconnection rate as in the standard laminar picture (e.g., Wendel et al 2013;Daughton et al 2014).…”
Section: Thoughts On the Interpretation Of This Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diffusion regions in two-dimensional reconnection simulations are easier to interpret than in 3D simulations because a boundary surface between unreconnected and reconnected field lines, the magnetic separatrix, exists in 2D reconnection. This paper is limited to interpretations of magnetic reconnection found in 2D PIC simulations although there have been recent simulations of 3D reconnectionboth symmetric (i.e., magnetotail) and asymmetric (i.e., dayside) (Daughton et al 2014). Common theoretical measures of diffusion regions include the following: (i) Slippage.…”
Section: Measures Of Diffusion Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%