1997
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9876.00055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing the Non-Central Beta Distribution Function

Abstract: Language Fortran 77 Description and PurposeThis paper gives an algorithm for computing the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of a non-central beta random variable. The algorithm proposed is based on the same recursion relationships as given by Lenth (1987) (algorithm AS 226) and Frick (1990) (algorithm AS R84), except that our algorithm uses the forward and backward recursion relationships, starting the computations at d!a2e, where ! is the non-centrality parameter, and does not restrict ITRMAX (described… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to avoid the under/overflow problems caused by starting the summation always at 0 = i several authors suggest [Guirguis (1990), Posten (1993), Chattamvelli and Shanmugam (1997), Benton and Krishnamoorthy (2003)] starting from an index approximately equal to 2 / λ and then work outward (increasing and decreasing i). Note that cancellation may occur whenever (5) is used in the forward iteration set.…”
Section: Round-off Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to avoid the under/overflow problems caused by starting the summation always at 0 = i several authors suggest [Guirguis (1990), Posten (1993), Chattamvelli and Shanmugam (1997), Benton and Krishnamoorthy (2003)] starting from an index approximately equal to 2 / λ and then work outward (increasing and decreasing i). Note that cancellation may occur whenever (5) is used in the forward iteration set.…”
Section: Round-off Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…488-495. Subsequent computer programs were also published: Chattamvelli and Shanmugam (1997), Ding (1997), Tiwari and Yang (1997). Major modern statistical software packages offer this type of calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of correct significant digits is given in parentheses algorithm of Chattamvelli and Shanmugam (1997) is actually slightly less accurate than Frick's algorithm (Frick 1990) for those large values of λ that are shown in Table 5. Since the precise details of the computations are not given in Chattamvelli and Shanmugam (1997), we cannot tell where the algorithm in Chattamvelli and Shanmugam (1997) suffers from a loss of precision.…”
Section: Example 2: Comparing the Accuracy Of Numerical Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the goals of Table 1 of Chattamvelli and Shanmugam (1997) was to illustrate that their algorithm gives more accurate results than Frick's algorithm (Frick 1990) for large values of λ. We reproduced selected rows of their table in Table 5, and extended it with an extra column showing the correct values up to 7 significant digits.…”
Section: Example 2: Comparing the Accuracy Of Numerical Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation